According to a study in JAMA, the incidence of heart issues has nearly doubled since January 2021 for those who have gotten the jab.
Health care is approaching $6 trillion a year.
Disease Management is now the largest economic driver in our country.
Do you know what that means?
The US is the foundation of most economies around the world.
So…
If war has been replaced by disease as the primary driver, we need larger and larger-scale health crises to keep the economy going.
It’s true…
Zach Bush, MD, a triple board-certified physician, reveals the real plans that the government has in store.
“We need a problem big enough to unify the world.”
The whole facade is coming down and more people are starting to realize the difference between reality and the lies we’re being fed.
we need larger and larger health crises for this economy…
being ungovernable is the only basis for just government
unless you can say "no," there is no such thing as "consent"
How Fanatics Took Over the World
by Jeffrey Tucker
Early in the pandemic, I had been furiously writing articles about lockdowns. My phone rang with a call from a man named Dr. Rajeev Venkayya. He is the head of a vaccine company but introduced himself as former head of pandemic policy for the Gates Foundation.
Now I was listening.
I did not know it then, but I’ve since learned from Michael Lewis’s (mostly terrible) book The Premonition that Venkayya was, in fact, the founding father of lockdowns. While working for George W. Bush’s White House in 2005, he headed a bioterrorism study group. From his perch of influence – serving an apocalyptic president — he was the driving force for a dramatic change in U.S. policy during pandemics.
He literally unleashed hell.
That was 15 years ago. At the time, I wrote about the changes I was witnessing, worrying that new White House guidelines (never voted on by Congress) allowed the government to put Americans in quarantine while closing their schools, businesses, and churches shuttered, all in the name of disease containment.
I never believed it would happen in real life; surely there would be public revolt. Little did I know, we were in for a wild ride…
As Reports of Injuries After COVID Vaccines Near 1 Million Mark, CDC, FDA Clear Pfizer, Moderna Boosters for All Adults
VAERS data released by the CDC included a total of 894,145 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 18,853 deaths and 139,126 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 12, 2021.
Here is a partial (edited) transcript from the presentation by Anna de Buisseret from my friend Simon in Australia.
Once people realise that they will be held accountable, then they have to stop. It’s a cease and desist
A fundamental maxim of law is that you have sovereignty over your own mind and body. Nobody gets to break that not even in times of public emergency. There is NO RIGHT to derogate (derogate meaning to detract from) from the fundamental right not to be tortured, or to receive cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment.
Those rights cannot be derogated from even in war. When you read the war conventions, the means and methods of warfare are not unlimited. You cannot, for example, run a campaign of terror against the occupied enemy. You cannot conduct live human experiments; give people medical treatment without their informed consent. That is against the law, even in war time.
So the idea that a bunch of bureaucrats in 2020 and 2021 get to come along and set aside our rule of law, claiming there is a public health emergency, is not legal, is not lawful, is not moral and it’s not ethical.
So what we’re doing is we’re identifying people who are breaking the law and we’re serving them with a notice of liability, which says to the individual - you personally are causing harm. You personally are in breach, of not only the Common Law, but you’re in breach of several international treaties, agreements, codes, declarations and conventions.
We are saying to people, you are individually accountable and liable in your personal capacity, criminally and civilly. There is nowhere to run, there is nowhere to hide. Because the law says YOU MUST UPHOLD THE LAW, you must not cause harm and you are personally liable.
We have drafted a notice of liability. It runs to 170 odd pages. It includes the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki, the Oviodo Convention (Human rights and biomedicine), and the Universal Declaration of Human rights - among others. The Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is in part as follows.
The person who is injecting someone is committing the actual act, anyone who is facilitating it, promoting it, marketing it, is aiding and abetting. If they are silent they are complicit. And so you have constitutional duty to act; to prevent harm.Staying silent is not an option.
How do you obtain informed consent about the long-term consequences when none of us knows?
We don’t have the long term safety data. How can a child of 5 agree to that? The parents can’t because on the evidence they are being lied to, they are being misled. It’s deceitful, it’s criminally fraudulent. Expert psychiatrists and psychologists have been analysing the mind-space. They have been analysing the messages from governments and media etc and based on their expert opinion, they have said that, and I quote in summary, “not a single person in the UK is able to give their informed consent, due to the military psychological warfare that has been conducted”
Let alone for children, but what that means is that no consent that’s been obtained is lawful or legal. That means that every person that’s been injected, even though they appear to have given their consent have been battered, they have been assaulted, they’ve been wounded. So any deaths, any injuries - that is a criminal act. This is VERY SERIOUS. These are the biggest crimes against humanity ever committed in the history of humankind, and the fact of it is that the law prohibits it.
Anna de Buisseret, UK Senior Lawyer, ex Military, ex Foozer.
Corruption of the agencies
Our healthcare system is broken, a fact nobody would have disputed in pre-COVID days. Regulatory capture is a reality, and the pharmaceutical industry is fraught with examples. Yet we trusted private-public partnerships to find an optimal solution to a global pandemic, assuming a crisis would bring out the best in historically corrupt institutions.
Here is a brief list of less-than-savory behavior demonstrated by our titans of healthcare:
Some examples of medical corruption that are being ignored by the medical community
I thought I'd start a list to capture what is going on. Nobody in the mainstream medical community seems to mind these abuses. They are remaining silent, so I guess these are all OK nowadays.
“vaccine = freedom” in Germany … similar to the Work will make you free, the sign outside of the concentration camps during the 1940’s Holocaust
The vast majority of the Western world has been transformed into a pseudo-medical dystopia in which you have to show your “health-purity papers” to enter a café and get a cup of coffee. People who refuse to get experimentally “vaccinated” against a virus that causes mild-to-moderate symptoms (or, often, no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected, and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, are being systematically segregated, stripped of their jobs, denied medical treatment, demonized as “a danger to society,” censored, fined, and otherwise persecuted.
…The Internet is brimming with examples of mass-hysterical and sadistic behavior.
And that’s not to mention the mass hysteria rampant among the New Normals themselves … for example, the parents who are lining up to get their children needlessly “vaccinated” and then rushed into the emergency room with “totally manageable myocarditis.”
Conversation with a Police Officer in Australia
Unjustified force directed at people for protesting and expressing their opinions. I am done with this. I refuse to be part of this. People are right to protest these restrictions. Freedom protests in Melbourne. In Perth, people were singing, that was fine. But in Melbourne, we took a grandma and slammed her down to the ground and sprayed her in the face. Such a dangerous event. Power to restrict people’s lives. Breaking the rules themselves, the ministers. Regional cop are more relaxed. Metro people really pushed the directives.
Fauci Must Be Fired and Arrested
The crimes of Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), is making news again as revelations of abusive research on dogs have surfaced. Interestingly, while many shrug at abuse of human beings, including the elderly, far fewer are willing to overlook the torture of dogs.
Kim Iversen makes the case that Fauci should resign or be fired over his repeated lies, questionable research ethics and mishandling of the pandemic.
Many others have also chimed in on the matter. In an October 24, 2021, article on Substack, Leighton Woodhouse points out that “Fauci has been abusing animals for 40 years,” and that “the stuff you’ve seen on social media barely scratches the surface.”
Why Is NIAID Funding a Psychological Torture Factory?
Perhaps one of the most gruesome experiments paid for by Fauci involves the psychological torturing of monkeys, for purposes that remain unclear. The experiment involves first boosting the monkeys’ capacity for terror by destroying a particular part of their brains with acid.
The monkeys are then tormented with plastic spiders and mechanical snakes as their behavior is observed. Bizarrely, these particular psychological experiments have been funded for 43 years straight, costing taxpayers nearly $100 million, even though they’ve not resulted in a single drug or medication.
As noted by White Coat Waste Project vice president Justin Goodman, “Some people have made a career out of torturing monkeys.
…the agency acknowledges that Fauci lied to Congress when he emphatically insisted the NIH/NIAID have never funded gain-of-function (GOF) research.
The letter, dated October 21, 2021, was sent by NIH principal deputy director Dr. Lawrence Tabak to James Comer, ranking member of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, “to provide additional information and documents regarding NIH's grant to EcoHealth Alliance Inc.”
The letter seems to be setting up EcoHealth as the ‘fall guy’ entity in this story, pinning all blame on the organization in order to allow for the U.S. Government Health agency to rinse its hands clean of any improper behavior. ~ Jordan Schachtel
A Crisis of Trust
Commenting on the latest revelations, health care entrepreneur and political commentator Vivek Ramaswamy tweeted:
“Another ‘conspiracy theory’ becomes accepted fact … So to sum it up:
1. US bans gain-of-function research
2. Rogue bureaucrats fund it abroad instead
3. Lab leak occurs. Global pandemic ensues
4. Scientific leaders lie about it and label dissenters as racists
Want to create a crisis of trust in science? That’ll do it… The facts have been apparent for a long time. The fact that the media missed it says a lot about the quality of true journalism in the US today: almost entirely absent.”
NIH Emails Prove Fauci Lied to Congress - Twice
“This is terrific! We are very happy to hear that our Gain of Function research funding pause has been lifted," Peter Daszak emailed an NIH official.
In 2016, when Peter Daszak of the pass-through virtual research organization “Eco-Health Alliance” was contact by the NIH, he was told that NIH staffers had determined that the research he was funded to conduct appeared to fall into the category of “Gain of Function” research, which was banned at the time he was funded. NIH put a pause on the research, which included serial passage of various forms of the SARS virus through humanized mice (mice with human ACE2 receptors) to determine the risk of enhanced infectivity if the virus were to jump to humans.
NIH then, incredibly, allowed Daszak to write his own determination on whether the research fell into that category. NIH staffers then found an error in Daszak’s “determination letter” and allowed him to revise the letter.
Daszak informed the NIH that UNC had “no oversight” of the research, and that the safety of the research fell under the scrutiny of a committee at the Wuhan Institute for Virology.
That was, apparently, good enough for the NIH: they informed Daszak that the pause was lifted.