All I Want for Christmas
Where I Live, No One Cares About COVID
Outside the world inhabited by the professional classes in a handful of major metropolitan areas, many Americans are leading their lives as if COVID is over.
In November, my wife asked me whether I had seen an article with the remarkable headline “Is It Safe to Go to Thanksgiving Dinner?”
“Is that from last year?” I asked.
“No, it’s a few days old,” she said, her voice sinking to a growling murmur. “These people.”
I am old enough to remember the good old days when holiday-advice pieces were all variations on “How to Talk to Your Tea Party Uncle About Obamacare.”
...outside the world inhabited by the professional and managerial classes in a handful of major metropolitan areas, many, if not most, Americans are leading their lives as if COVID is over, and they have been for a long while.
In my part of rural southwest Michigan, and in similar communities throughout the country, this is true not despite but without any noticeable regard for cases; hospitalization statistics, which are always high this time of year without attracting much notice; or death reports.
...When I read headlines like “Here’s Who May Need a Fourth COVID-19 Vaccine Dose,” I find myself genuinely reeling. Wait, there are four of them now? I would be lying if I said I knew what all the variants were or what differences exist between them. (They all sound like the latest entry in some down-market action franchise: Tom Clancy’s Delta Variant: A Jack Ryan Novel, Transformers 4: Rise of the Omicron.) COVID is invisible to me except when I am reading the news, in which case it strikes me with all the force of reports about distant coups in Myanmar.
Granted, my family’s experience of 2020 was somewhat unusual. But I wager that I am now closer to most of my fellow Americans than the people, almost absurdly overrepresented in media and elite institutions, who are still genuinely concerned about this virus. And in some senses my situation has always been more in line with the typical American’s pandemic experience than that of someone in New York or Washington, D.C., or Los Angeles.
...They (kids) have continued seeing friends and family, including their great-grandparents, on a weekly basis. As far as I can tell, they are dimly aware that “germs” are a remote cause of concern...
The CDC recommends that all adults get a booster shot; I do not know a single person who has received one.
...Indeed, there is something small-minded and puritanical and distinctly American about the whole business of obsessing over whether vaccinated teachers remove their face covering during a long school day. (When I read such things, I experience the same secondhand embarrassment I felt upon witnessing an American tourist in Rome ask a waiter at a trattoria to remove the ashtray from the outdoor table at which the employee in question had just been smoking.)
I am always tempted to ask the people who breathlessly quote what various public-health authorities are now saying about masking and boosters whether they know how the National Institutes of Health defines a “problem drinker”? The answer is a woman who has more than one “unit” of alcohol a day, i.e., my wife and nearly all of my female friends. These same authorities, if asked, would probably say that considerable risks are associated with eating crudos or kibbeh nayyeh, or taking Tylenol after a hangover. (This is to say nothing of cannabis, which is of course still banned at the federal level.) My point is that sophisticated adults are generally capable of winking at overly stringent guidelines.
...I am afraid that the future, at least in major metropolitan areas, is one in which sooner or later elites will acknowledge their folly while continuing to impose it on others.
if not now, when?
if not you, who?
COVID-19 Protocolists are Killing People. By-Demand NOW. You Must Act Now.
Doctors "Treating COVID-19" Are Not Practicing Medicine. They are Executing Highly Restricted Protocols. Humanity Deserves Better from "Medicine". We Won't Get it Unless YOU ACT Now.
James Lyons-Weiler
Once your loved one is admitted for COVID-19 to a hospital full of protocolists, monoclonal antibodies are no longer an option. No reason is given, it’s just protocol.
Once your loved one is admitted to a hospital full of protocolists for COVID-19, you cannot get the doctors to vary from the protocol with options other than those they are told they can use. Those options?
-O2 support
-Lovenox
-Remdesivir
-Vitamin D&C
-Nasal cannula feeding tube
-Intubation (ventilator)
-Palliative care
-Comfort care
-Cremation, or relocation for embalming.
If your loved one does not want Acetaminophen (e.g., Tylenol_, or Ibuprofen (e.g., Motrin), but instead wants aspirin, it’s a no-go. Aspirin, by the way, helps break up microclots in the lungs. You’ll only get push-back on the risk of bleeding with long-term use.
COVID-19 is an acute condition. But hey, they have their protocols.
…
now we need By-Demand legislation that makes it a felony for physicians to deny care options that might work.
We need to force them to practice medicine, or risk jailtime.
We know what works, and when it works. We know what does not work, and why.
Early, aggressive therapies work.
Call your Senator. And your Congressional Representative.
Ask them to support By-Demand outpatient and inpatient care with COVID-19
By-Demand is, literally, whatever the family asks for - as long as there is a chance it might work.
This is the original criterion for Emergency Use Authorization, which is being ignored by FDA for early, effective therapies.
We must overrule the FDA, the NIH and the CDC.
They are captured.
They have perverted Right-to-Try legislation for COVID-19, claiming patients only can select among options offered by their physicians.
The protocolists had to learn via activism that high-dose IV-Vitamin C prevents sepsis.
We must force them to accept the facts about early aggressive treatment.
It’s all here. All 1207 studies.
https://c19early.com/
Here’s a one-page summary of the science on Ivermectin.
Here are the FLCCC.net protocols translated into many languages.
Find your Congressman and Tell Them We Need By-Demand Outpatient and Inpatient Care for COVID-19
https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
Find your Senator and Tell Them We Need By-Demand Outpatient and Inpatient Care for COVID-19
https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm
Send them links to the FLCCC.net protocols and c19early.com - send them everything - and let them know the public knows the truth about the science supporting early, aggressive ambulatory care.
from Kyle Young:
With the UK Royal Court of Justice recently allowing extradition of Julian Assange to the US, Wikileaks has just dumped all of its files onto the internet. Things are about to get very interesting.
Wikileaks file dump
Pennsylvania Supreme Court ends school mask mandate
School age children in Pennsylvania are no longer forced to wear masks inside schools, after a recent court decision.
Sharyl Attkisson
General Hospital’ Star Sues ABC After Being Fired for Not Getting COVID Vaccine
Ingo Rademacher, an actor on “General Hospital” for almost 25 years, sued ABC for terminating his contract without explanation after he asked for a religious exemption to the company’s COVID vaccine mandate.
Former “General Hospital” star Ingo Rademacher filed a lawsuit Monday against American Broadcasting Company (ABC) over the network’s refusal to grant a religious exemption to its COVID vaccine requirements.
Rademacher, who played Jasper “Jax” Jacks on “General Hospital” for almost 25 years, was fired last month after refusing to get vaccinated. In a lawsuit, he alleged the company’s mandate is unconstitutional and amounts to religious discrimination.
According to the complaint, ABC said it would grant exemptions to the COVID vaccine requirement for sincerely held religious objections, but denied Rademacher’s request on Nov. 5, without explanation, and subsequently terminated his contract.
Documents show Rademacher on Oct. 11 sent an email to the human resources department of The Walt Disney Company, ABC’s parent company, stating:
“I am entitled to a religious exemption against mandatory vaccination for COVID-19 on the basis of my deeply and sincerely held moral belief that my body is endowed by my creator with natural processes to protect me and that its natural integrity cannot ethically be violated by the administration of artificially created copies of genetic material, foreign to nature and experimental.
“This moral objection is in keeping with my rights of conscience articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Welsh v. U.S. (1970) 398 U.S. 333, 339–340. Discrimination against me on the basis of my religious values and rights of conscience is contrary to law and the Civil Rights Act. Disparate treatment of me on this basis is not permitted under State and federal law.”
Company officials followed up by asking Rademacher to participate in an interview “with a lawyer who works for Disney/ABC human relations, and was more akin to cross-examination designed to elicit information that ABC could use to deny the request for an exemption.”
The complaint alleges “questioning the sincerity of one’s religious beliefs in order to deny a request for an exemption to the COVID vaccine mandate constitutes religious discrimination and violates federal and state civil rights laws.”
Rademacher is represented by John Howard, Scott Street and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and lead counsel for Children’s Health Defense.
In an email to The Defender, Street said:
“This case is about freedom, including freedom of religion and the right to privacy that all Californians have under our state constitution. Cases decided a hundred years ago don’t change that. The world has evolved since then. The law has evolved since then. We look forward to litigating those issues in court.”
Rademacher’s suit also claims the network’s vaccine mandate violated his right to privacy.
“This should not be a political issue,” the complaint states. “There is no need for everybody to get the COVID-19 shot, even if the president demands it.”
Rademacher addressed his exit from the show in a video posted Dec. 5 to Instagram:
“I was on the show for 25 years. They’re like my family, a lot of the people there and I was really hoping that I could play Jax for another 10 or 25 years,” Rademacher said, adding his exit from the show “is still something that I’m trying to process.”
Radmacher said receiving a COVID vaccine should be a choice:
“If you want to go get the vaccine, get the vaccine. If you think it’s going to protect you, that’s great. But you should be able to make that choice. I think we all need to fight this because I don’t agree with vaccine mandates.
“Obviously, you already know that I do not agree with corporations ever, ever being able to mandate a vaccine to keep your job, to keep your livelihood … that’s coercion, and that is not freedom of choice at all. So, I’m really frustrated with what’s going on in this world right now.”
Steve Burton, another star on General Hospital confirmed on Nov. 23 he too was fired from the show for refusing to get a COVID vaccine. Burton applied for religious and medical exemptions, but ABC denied them, the Wall Street Journal reported.
In an Instagram post, Burton said, “this is also about personal freedom” and he doesn’t “think anybody should lose their livelihood over this.”
FDA Rep a No-Show at Court Hearing, Citing COVID Concerns; FDA Releases Additional Docs; and FDA Triples Down On 75-Year Production
It is now in the hands of the Court to render a decision...
Aaron Siri
The FDA incredibly failed to send a representative to a federal court hearing in this matter on December 14th because of the “FDA’s protocols” regarding COVID-19. Meaning, despite the federal health agencies’ compliance rate with its mandatory vaccination policy of over 98.8% and its resounding claim that the vaccines are “effective,” the FDA is apparently still scared. Its actions speak volumes and cast serious doubt on its words.
2. Just prior to the Court hearing, the FDA released additional documents. These included a report on vaccine safety and a report on vaccine efficacy. There are many notable portions, but we will leave that to the scientists to analyze noting that, as the experts in the plaintiff’s group have explained, adequate analysis of the vaccines’ safety and efficacy is nearly impossible to complete without the full universe of documents.
3. Contrary to what has been reported elsewhere, there has been no decision issued in this case yet and any documents produced to date have been produced by the FDA apparently in the hopes of softening any decision the Court may render.
A Non-Vaccine by Any Other Name
Diane Perlman, PhD
I vote for VaxGene
Number of Unvaxxed in USA is Grossly Understated
This explains why US "unvaxxed case rates" are so high compared to the UK.
Igor Chudov
An article appeared in Bloomberg, titled “Vaccine Data Gaps Point to Millions More in U.S. Who Lack Shots”. The article might seem arcane, but leads to far reaching conclusions.
The most important conclusion that I will reach is that case rate calculations of unvaxxed Covid cases are grossly overstated. This leads to doubt as to whether actual effectiveness of vaccines exists at all. We know that it does NOT exist in the UK, where proper accounting shows that vaccines invite Covid instead of repelling it.
The second conclusion is that we, the unvaxxed, are not the tiny minority they want us to think we are, and we will win.
The U.S. government has over-counted the number of Americans who are at least partly vaccinated against the coronavirus, state officials warn, meaning millions more people are unprotected as the pandemic’s winter surge gathers steam.
The bottom line of the article, is that the CDC and state officials have no idea how many unvaccinated people are there in the US. They thought that it was 27% of the entire population (including babies). But it is clear that the number of unvaccinated was mis-stated, and is much higher.
How much higher?
In the European Union, [the number of partially vaxxed] just 2.6 percentage points.
The biggest difference between the US and the EU, is that there is better bookkeeping and accounting for vaccination in the EU, as opposed to the US.
Additionally, the article did not mention it, but in the US there is a thriving black market for fake vaccinations, whereas a corrupt doctor enters someone as vaccinated, gets paid for the vaccination, gets cash from the vaccine-hesitant individual, and then empties the syringe out into the sink.
Some vaccinations may be wholly “paper vaccinations”, recorded to get payment from the government, but without vaccinees even present or existing. This is the United States and there is plenty of doctors scamming government programs like Medicare.
This probably explains nonsensical results like vaccination rates among seniors exceeding 100%. They do not exceed 100%, instead it is handiwork of Medicare scamming medical offices wasting vaccines and getting paid for it. I heard about fraudulent doctors when I visited a bar last time. But let’s set this aside for now.
The Bloomberg article says that the number of partially vaxxed is 11.2% (72.5-61.43%). Assuming that the number of partially vaxxed is similar to Europe, say 3%, we get that 8% of people previously thought to be partly vaccinated, are in fact either fully unvaccinated, or fully vaccinated. So, the number of unvaccinated may be not 27%, but several percent higher. So, say, if we have 33% instead of 27% unvaxxed, it means that the unvaxxed were undercounted by 22% of the original number.
There’s more here…
State of Florida finally adopts the Zelenko Protocol recommendations of prophylaxis and early treatment.
Nice job Governer Desantis and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo
https://rumble.com/vqysjw-dr.-jose...
http://www.healthieryoufl.org/response.html
Detox from aluminum (all the jabs have aluminum adjuvants)
Review on How These Vaccines Work
And Why It Matters, What Has Changed In Peer Reviewed Studies Since We Started This Insanity
by Joe Sheehan
These vaccines are a new technology. They really aren’t vaccines by the traditional definition of vaccines. This is why the CDC changed the definition of vaccines on their website. This is a review of how these mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) and DNA (J&J) vaccines work. The media let us know this nightly at the start of the vaccination campaign.
All three of these vaccines trick your body into making spike proteins that match the spike protein of the coronavirus that causes Covid. The two mRNA vaccines do this by inserting an mRNA strand into the ribosomes of our cells. When this mRNA makes its way into our ribosomes, it tell our cells to produce spike protein (loose spike protein). This is almost the same thing that a virus does except the virus instructs the human cells to manufacture new viruses. Once the cells produce enough of the new virus, the cell dies and many new viruses make their way into our bodies looking for more ACE-2 receptors to attack another cell.
As this is happening our body is developing an immune response to these viruses. This immune response has the body produce antibodies that are specific to the virus that the immune system wants to destroy. The immune system will develop antibodies to every part of the coronavirus with a natural infection. With the vaccines, the body will only produce antibodies to spike protein specifically. The adenovirus vaccine (J&J) works the same way except instead of using mRNA to trick the body into producing spike protein, it uses an adenovirus to trick the body into making spike protein with DNA. The mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles to help deliver the mRNA to our ribosomes.
Originally we were told the injection was to remain in the deltoid (shoulder muscle) where the shot was given. We now know this is not true in mice, rats, and monkeys that were given the Pfizer shot in part of a bio-distribution study. It is most likely not true in other mammals (humans) either and spike protein once produced by our own bodies cells will be distributed throughout our bodies.
This following is directly from the CDC website.
From CDC Website How mRNA Vaccines Work
To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, mRNA vaccines use mRNA created in a laboratory to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. That immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies.
Vaccinated FC Barcelona Star Sergio Aguero Announces Retirement Following Heart Injury
The former Man City striker was diagnosed with a cardiac arrhythmia last month after suffering chest pains while playing for Barcelona.
wow, i agree with the new york times!
(but probably not with how they meant this)
heck, i'll even go one further: it's a full blown civilizational acid test.
if we let these pseudoscientific charlatans terrify us into submission again while pushing social control as public health, we're done for.
next pandemic they'll crush us.
especially and increasingly in the US, the grab for full bio-tyranny control has failed. more and more of these folks are realizing it. the bastions of health subjugation are going to give it one more run for their money, but it’s falling apart even in places like new york.
…ut this is not a game you only play one time. they are already onto the next one and planning for it and there is one simple fact that’s sure as eggs is eggs:
if you grant near unlimited power to governments during emergencies, they will produce an endless cavalcade of hobgoblins and crises to get at them.
emergency will become the norm.
you might as well try storing your jam in an anthill.
so yes, 100% omicron is the dress rehearsal for the next one.
this is the exam, amigos.
pass it, or fail your society.
Finally! A recorded interview with a Harvard professor who disagrees with me
by Steve Kirsch
One of my friends arranged for me to have an 80-minute recorded Zoom discussion with a Harvard professor who believes the COVID vaccines are safe. Here's what happened.
Dr. Ozonoff is Faculty Scientist, Division of Infectious Diseases, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School.
With credentials like that, you'd expect him to refuse to engage with anyone (like me) who disagrees with the mainstream narrative. He had clearly read some of the things I had written so he knew what my views were.
I was pleasantly surprised to find him open to discussing a wide range of issues, starting with “How come nobody is willing to talk about this stuff nowadays?”
Towards the end of the interview, we get into questions like “Is the vaccine safe?” and “Has the vaccine killed more people than it saved?” and “Is it possible that I’m right about this?”
You’ll find this interview to be a rare insight into the current state of medical profession with respect to dissenting views, vaccine misinformation, reliance on authorities, etc.
Dr. Ozonoff is truly exceptional
I applaud his willingness to do something few of his colleagues are willing to do: have an open discussion with people he doesn’t agree with.
While we (currently) don’t see eye-to-eye on all issues (there are some issues we totally agree on but he’s not allowed to say those on-camera as you might imagine), he’s open to exploring what the data says about vaccine safety in future conversations.
We’ve always said we are open to anyone showing us how we got it wrong and he has the same attitude about his position.
Dr. Ozonoff is a credit to his profession and I look forward to future conversations.
Here’s the interview on Rumble: Dr. Al Ozonoff interview: Have the vaccines killed more people than they have saved?
https://rumble.com/vquomm-dr.-al-ozonoff-interview-have-the-vaccines-killed-more-people-than-they-sav.html
