From Jonathon Otto
Is your employer planning your replacement?
Do they have records of whether or not you’ve got the Covid injection?
…and do you really know, and believe, the answers you get?
Why would they make these plans?
Because they’re afraid the injection will kill their employees.
With vax-related deaths exceeding 11,000 (or 45,000 according to a whistleblower) and over 491,000 adverse reactions reported on Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — a voluntary reporting system — as of July 16, 2021 (and a Harvard study revealing this could be less than 1% of the true deaths), it’s overdue time you learn the truth that’s being hidden by the mainstream media…
In order to make an informed decision for yourself.
You can view the 10-Episode docuseries Vaccine Secrets: Covid Crisis here
Sadly, many experts have been silenced because of their dedication to finding the truth.
They aren’t bowing down to the media and for political purposes so they’ve been censored and de-platformed.
You deserve to know the truth that’s being covered up and hidden.
That’s why I think it’s vital you hear what they have to say…
Click here now to watch Vaccine Secrets: Covid Crisis and learn the truth that’s been hidden from you
Cardiologist claims over half of the current COVID cases are people who have gotten a COVID injection
Dr. Peter A. McCullough is a cardiologist, principal faculty member in Internal Medicine for the Texas A & M University Health Sciences Center, and Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center. With over three dozen peer-reviewed articles related to COVID-19 treatment protocols, Dr. McCullough has become a well-known and controversial name during the pandemic.
Most recently, Dr. McCullough has come out with a bold claim: that at least half of new COVID infections result from injections.
Even the mainstream media admits that CDC “understates” the real number of breakthrough infections, there’s a real reason to question just how “safe and effective” these unapproved shots truly are
According to a recent June article published by the Associated Press, the CDC does not know the true percentage of hospitalizations and deaths occurring in fully jabbed people. Indeed, the CDC isn’t even tracking how many fully jabbed people are testing positive yet remaining out of the hospital.
If so many breakthrough cases among “fully jabbed” people are still happening (perhaps more than we know of), why are schools and employers requiring these shots as a condition of enrollment or employment?
Peggy Hall: DOJ does not make laws. Only Congress and State Legislatures make laws.
Santa Clara county revises Death Toll Count for COVID (also Alameda county and others)
Eric Clapton Regrets Taking Two Shots
Merck no longer holds the patent so the drug can be made by anyone and has been used for many years SAFE AND EFFECTIVE and now around the world in India, Mexico, Africa, over the counter saving lives in those countries but banned in the USA. Dr Hahn who worked for the FDA banned Ivermectin and then he went to work for Moderna. No conflict of interest there, right.
Ivermectin — a broad-spectrum antiparasitic that also has anti-inflammatory activity — has been found to reduce COVID-19 mortality by 81%. In one prevention trial, 58 volunteers took 12 milligrams of ivermectin once per month for four months.
Only four (6.96%) came down with mild COVID-19 symptoms during the May through August 2020 trial period.
On December 8, 2020, Dr. Pierre Kory testified to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which held a hearing on “Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution.” He called on the NIH, CDC and FDA to review the expansive data on ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, keep those with early symptoms from progressing and help critically ill patients recover:
Despite his impassioned pleas and astonishing science to back them up, the treatment was not only ignored by the committee but promptly eviscerated.
YouTube removed Kory’s testimony, which had nearly 9 million views, calling it a danger to the community. Kory says that while his research on ivermectin has gotten lots of attention worldwide, it’s gotten zero in the U.S. — “U.S. is on a media lockdown,” he said.
“Had there been an existing known, safe and effective treatment for COVID-19, Emergency Use Authorization of a vaccine for the virus would be prohibited by law. Could that have been part of the motivation for the strange censorship of certain COVID-19 treatments that we witnessed over the past year at news and social media corporations?”
Big Tech censorship of LIFE SAVING TREATMENTS
Most Common Adverse events
We’ve known from the very beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic that children were at exceptionally low risk for hospitalization and death from this infection. Despite that, massive efforts are underway to get a needle in the arm of every child.
At present, COVID-19 injections are authorized for emergency use in children as young as 12 in the U.S., and vaccine makers are moving forward with plans to get authorization for children as young as 6 months.
PCR Tests via Jon Rappoport
The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.
The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:
“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.
BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.
If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Dr Z’s Life Saving treatment protocols for COVID
Treat patients as soon as possible, preferably within the first 5 days of symptoms.
TRY TO KEEP PATIENTS OUT OF THE HOSPITAL
Low risk patient - Younger than 45, no comorbidities, and clinically stable
High risk patient - Older than 45, younger than 45 with comorbidities, or clinically unstable
Low risk patients
Supportive care with fluids, fever control, and rest
Elemental Zinc 50mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Vitamin C 1000mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Vitamin D3 5000iu 1 time a day for 7 days
Optional over the counter options
Quercetin 500mg 2 times a day for 7 days or
Epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG) 400mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Moderate / High risk patients
Elemental Zinc 50-100mg once a day for 7 days
Vitamin C 1000mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Vitamin D3 10000iu once a day for 7 days or 50000iu once a day for 1-2 days
Azithromycin 500mg 1 time a day for 5 days or
Doxycycline 100mg 2 times a day for 7 days
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg 2 times a day for 5-7 days
and/or
Ivermectin 0.4-0.5mg/kg/day for 5-7 days
Either or both HCQ and IVM can be used, and if one only, the second agent may be added after about 2 days of treatment if obvious recovery has not yet been observed etc.