Is Gruesome looking for a class action lawsuit PLUS his recall and 40+ lawsuits against him?
Despite the California Department of Public Health’s stating that we are OPENING UP California by June 15th, to put an end finally to Gruesome’s illegal mandates, he now says no, not gonna happen. Does he really think that his illegal sweepstakes plus this 15 month long lockdown of our state is gonna just whiz on by us?
How many companies, businesses and families has he hurt by now?
We need to put him in his place. Every day I get emails from him asking for money. All he has done has ignored seniors like me, for instance with the Golden State Stimulus payment. And ignored all of the people without homes (50% who are seniors). And ignored everything important to our state and keeps on pushing the lie that the recall is Republican when IT IS NOT.
CA has the most polluted air in the nation. ERIN BROCKOVITZ KEEPS TALKING ABOUT OUR DIRTY WATER AND DROUGHT IN CALIFORNIA. TRULY AN EMERGENCY UNLIKE THE FAKE PANDEMIC.
BUT NO WORRIES OUR GOVERNOR WHO THINKS HE IS CZAR IS TOO BUSY WASTING TAXPAYER DOLLARS ON HIS WHEEL OF JEOPARDY AND DISCRIMINATING AGAINST HIS VOTERS, RESIDENTS OF CALIFORNIA.
Enough is enough is enough is enough.
Gruesome’s Wheel of Jeopardy
How Much Will Your Medical Bills Cost?
How Much Is Your Life Worth?
Using TAXPAYER MONEY TO SPIN THE WHEEL TO GET A FEW MORE VOTES, MAYBE MAYBE NOT
Looks like all of the bribes aka incentives are not working out that well
SCANDALS GALORE
Scandals going on right now: Fauci-Gate emails, suppressed info that Fauci funded Gain of Function research at Wuhan lab, his lies about masks, and more, pressure / incentives to get the jab, terribly high number of reported adverse effects from the shots, Bill Gates and Microsoft relationship with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Wuhan drug trafficking the Opioid crisis (fentanyl), and other conflicts of interest and lies being exposed about how COVID has been treated in US and around the world, violation of the Nuremberg Code and other laws… not to mention the Great Reset….
Questions I’ve been asking for this past year has been why are the Democrats (President Biden, Democrat Governors including Gruesome) pressuring Americans to take the needle (Trump’s deal with the drug companies-Operation Warp Speed). And why are the Democrats going Full Speed Ahead with Keeping Americans in the dark about COVID and continuing the masks, lockdowns and vaccine passports? They are invested in this debunked scam and need TO STOP IT NOW.
Here is an insane list of Incentives for getting jabbed (does not even mention the $15 million sweepstakes, various colleges incentives-free tuition and more)...or the $100 my friend told me her friends have been bribed with and a friend in jail has been forced with getting.
Businesses are going all out for the jab (governments cannot mandate the shots so they are encouraging businesses to do their dirty work for them)... Government leaders, again Democratic Governors and White House leadership.
Not to mention the nonstop media advertisements, continual "news" about getting the shots and phone calls by employers to remind people (nurses, employees in many fields and caregivers) or to set up their appointment.
Some might call this propaganda... not news...
What’s next, bring in your dogs/cats to get the jab and you will get free veterinary care for life? (God forbid). Or win a trip around the world, free drugs for life, or get a PR job at the White House/Governor’s mansion? How about a date with the movie star, singer, celebrity of your choice (since they are collaborating with dating apps via Russell Brand, remember).
Come on up get your shot on the prize show (PRICE IS RIGHT, WHEEL OF FORTUNE, IT’S MORE LIKE JEOPARDY) and you will win a BIG SUPER DUPER DREAM PRIZE (Oprah, you get a car and you get a car and you get a car AND YOU GET A JAB AND YOU GET A JAB AND YOU GET A JAB)…
Dr. Pamela Popper
The pressure to get a COVID vaccine has become increasingly intense, with some officials even offering entry into multi-million-dollar lotteries as incentives to get the jab.
Perhaps that alone should arouse some suspicion. If the vaccines were, as promised, safe and effective, it seems that seven-figure enticements would not be required – they would sell themselves.
The appetite for medical treatment in the U.S. is huge – Americans spend about $3.5 trillion dollars on healthcare per year. So why are so many people refusing to get vaccinated?
An objective look at risks and benefits of COVID vaccines is required in order to make an intelligent decision.
According to the vaccine makers and their government and media partners, the vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective. Let’s look at efficacy first.
Tal Zaks, Chief Medical Officer of Moderna, admitted in 2020 that the clinical trials were not designed to prove that his company’s vaccine prevented infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death.
It seems that the reason to get the vaccine would be to prevent these events. But in spite of this rather stunning admission, the vaccine makers and government officials report that the vaccines are as much as 95% effective. How can this be?
One of the ways in which the public is consistently misled about the efficacy of medical interventions is the reporting of data in relative rather than absolute terms.
Drug companies like to use relative reporting of trial results because doing so makes their products look better.
For example, let’s say the incidence of a disease in the general population is 2%. A company makes a vaccine that reduces the risk of disease from 2% to 1%. There are two ways to report these data:
the vaccine reduces the risk by 50% (1 is 50% of 2)
the vaccine reduces the risk by 1% (the difference between 1 and 2 is 1)
Aside from the fact that you might not be concerned about a disease that you have a 98% chance of not getting, clearly 50% reduction sounds more compelling than 1% reduction.
The constant use of relative data is a form of reporting bias that makes COVID vaccines and many other medical interventions appear more appealing than they might be if the absolute data were used. So let’s see what the real absolute efficacy rate is for two of the COVID vaccines.
For the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine:
relative risk reduction 95.1% (90.0%-97.6%) - sounds really good!
absolute risk reduction 0.7% (0.59%-0.83%) – not so good
For the Moderna vaccine:
relative risk reduction, 94.1% (89.1%-96.8%) – sounds really good!
absolute risk reduction, 1.1% (0.97%-1.32%) – not so good!
These minor reductions in risk can sound even less appealing when considering that according to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), as of May 21 2021, 4224 deaths had been reported from COVD vaccines, along with 300,000+ injuries, some of which are serious enough that it is unlikely that the affected people will recover.
You have to decide what you think of these data and what you think is best for your own health. But the average person reading this article has a 99.98% chance of recovering from COVID-19 if he or she becomes ill.
For children there is a statistically 0% chance of serious illness and death. It seems that the COVID vaccines are a solution looking for a non-existent problem to solve.
If it's really about protecting the public against COVID-19, why aren't recovered COVID patients — whose protection is far superior to vaccine-induced immunity — offered some sort of immunity passport or granted access to sporting events or education that is now only granted to those with vaccine certificates?
There are multiple therapeutic drugs that are at least as effective as the vaccines are. They're already available and cheap … An off-patent drug called ivermectin, one of the most widely-used drugs in the world, is able to reduce symptoms at any stage of the disease, including lethality by about 90%. So, you don't need vaccines and you don't need any of the measures that have been introduced at all."
Why Have Effective Treatments Been Suppressed?
Like Yeadon, McCullough has raised serious questions about the need for a vaccine. Evidence clearly shows there are highly effective treatments, yet they've been near-universally suppressed in favor of these experimental shots. Why? If it's about protecting public health and saving lives, why would effective treatments be vilified?
As noted by McCullough during a roundtable discussion in the first of several U.S.-based tribunals on COVID-19, something very unusual happened in 2020. For the first time, doctors around the world were actively discouraged and prevented from saving their patients. There was "an enormous, complete, pervasive, steadfast suppression of any attempts to help patients with COVID-19," he said, adding:
"We seem to somehow have developed a uniform game plan … to passively allow as much suffering hospitalization and death as possible, create enormous amounts of fear in our society, and then be prepared for mass vaccination."
The vaccine may increase susceptibility to the virus and make people more likely to die from the infection, and data41 now show COVID-19 deaths are spiking around the world right along with rising vaccination rates, even though countries were trending toward herd immunity and deaths were at an all-time low right before the vaccines were released.
The mRNA vaccines also trigger your body to produce antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and the spike proteins in turn contain syncytin-homologous proteins that are essential for the formation of placenta. If a woman's immune system starts reacting against syncytin-1, then there is the possibility she will miscarry if pregnant and ultimately become infertile.
Mass vaccinating children and women of childbearing age against COVID-19 is a profoundly bad idea that could cause mass infertility if the COVID jab triggers an immune reaction against syncytin-1.
We also now know that the worst symptoms of COVID-19 are created by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and that is the very thing these gene-based vaccines are instructing your body to make. What's worse, the spike protein your body creates is a genetically modified version that appears far more toxic than the spike protein found in the actual virus.
Gambleing With Your Life
I would encourage everyone to do your homework, keep reading and learning, weigh the potential pros and cons, ignore all pressure tactics and take your time when deciding whether to get any of these COVID-19 gene therapies.
And, if you or someone you love has already received a COVID-19 vaccine and are experiencing side effects, be sure to report it, preferably to all three of these locations.43 While adverse effects and deaths have thus far been ignored, we need as much data as possible if we're to have any chance of stopping this mass vaccination campaign and push toward population control.
If you live in the U.S., file a report on VAERS
Report the injury on VaxxTracker.com, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker (you can file anonymously if you like)