Getting Back to Normal
Getting Back to Normal
Listen to Doctor Malone and Dr. Pierre Kory
Joe Rogan
Dr. Robert Malone hits it out of the park on Joe Rogan
Well worth the 3 hour time investment. Trust me on that.
Steve Kirsch
Here’s the link for the episode. You can listen audio only or video. I listened to most of it while on the ski slopes today and finished it at home. I don’t think he could have done a better job. I can’t recommend this episode enough. One friend of mine said he has been listening to Rogan for years and thought this was the best episode ever.
(NOTE: I listened to one hour so far and it cleared up a bunch of items for me. One of the items he talked about was the Trusted News Initiative which he wrote about below).
The Most important to me item that he shared was about how important Natural Immunity is. He said that people who have had COVID DO NOT NEED THE JABS. And are at HIGHER RISK of experiencing ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS IF THEY DO.
He had COVID in February 2020 before doctors and scientists knew what was going on. He learned about the Chinese EARLY TREATMENT protocol using hydroxychloroquine. Dr. Zelenko told Trump about it and it soon became politicized here in the USA.
Dr. Malone took the jab because he thought it was best FOR HIMSELF at the time.
He later realized more about the jabs. He suffered from long COVID. And he worked with other doctors to find repurposed drugs to treat patients early. Ivermectin and Hydroxy being two of the drugs.
Here’s a thread of cliff notes for the
podcast with Dr… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1477032151493267460.html…
Straight from the horse’s mouth… :-) Dr. Malone says he has horses.
Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of the nine original mRNA vaccine patents, which were originally filed in 1989 (including both the idea of mRNA vaccines and the original proof of principle experiments) and RNA transfection. Dr. Malone, has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications which have been cited over 12,000 times. Since January 2020, Dr. Malone has been leading a large team focused on clinical research design, drug development, computer modeling and mechanisms of action of repurposed drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Malone is the Medical Director of The Unity Project, a group of 300 organizations across the US standing against mandated COVID vaccines for children. He is also the President of the Global Covid Summit, an organization of over 16,000 doctors and scientists committed to speaking truth to power about COVID pandemic research and treatment.
I don't always lose half a million followers on twitter
But when I do...
Robert Malone, MD
…Of course, the fact that Twitter permanently banned me without any notice and without ANY reason given - other than I violated “content” (actual violation was not defined) is shocking. Yes, I do have a number of lawyers working on this. Yes, there will be action of some sort coming. I just don’t know yet what form it will take. The Alex Berenson lawsuit against Twitter for banning him for tweeting about vaccines’ failure to stop the infection and transmission of the virus, a tweet that Twitter labeled “misleading.”, is an initial salvo in what is likely to be a long legal fight to regain freedom of speech in this public forum. It is important to recognize that Twitter is now relying on big media such as Thompson-Reuters to provide “factchecking” regarding “misleading” information concerning vaccines. Reuters is horizontally integrated with Pfizer at the Board of Directors level, and their “factcheckers” have been harassing me this week because I spoke about the risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 genetic vaccination in children with Neil Oliver on UK-based GB News.
As to what triggered Twitter, the last thing I posted related to this excellent summary of the Pfizer malfeasance and data manipulation in their “Comirnaty” vaccine clinical studies.
This is censorship. Pure and simple. This is what our country has come to. No better than China. So, I join the ranks of other patriots for freedom who have been banned.
…Art Moore of WMD did a nice piece on the Joe Rogan interview with me. It is worth a read:
Dr. Robert Malone spends 3 hours with Joe Rogan after Twitter ban
'If it's not OK for me to be part of the conversation ... who can be allowed?'
Epoch Times wrote an article on my getting banned from Twitter.
Twitter Suspends Key mRNA Vaccine Contributor Dr. Robert Malone By Jack Phillips December 29, 2021 Updated: December 30, 2021
Everyday I try to get over to realclearpolitics.com to read various news stories. I find that they are one of the very few aggregators of news left that tries to present both sides. What do I find this morning, but an actual article on my getting banned from twitter.
The story that RealClear links to is a NewsMax piece - which can be found here:
”Blocked by Twitter, Vaccine Pioneer Malone Says He'll Keep 'Telling the Truth”
The article also links to an interview I did with NewsMax, just after the Joe Rogan show.
On “Science” and Controversy
Infectious disease outbreaks require constant re-evaluation of accepted truth
Robert Malone, MD
…Good science (and good public health policy) requires conflict. There is no one “Science”. No single “truth”. Quality science is like a song sung by a choir. A solo scientist is usually better described as a philosopher or priest. Any individual claiming to embody “Science” or scientific truth is (by definition) no longer a practitioner of the intellectual discipline of modern science.
The scientific process requires constant external challenge and criticism to reach a working approximation of truth. Such (typically autocratic, paternalistic) people lose the ability to maintain objectivity and typically transition to functioning as an enforcer of their version of reality.
These people often resort to a form of crude binary thought – their version of the truth versus all alternatives. In contrast, the modern scientific practitioner approaches the effort to draw truth out of the unknown as something closer to mathematical calculus, a process of serial approximation which gradually approaches an asymptote hypothesized to be scientific truth.
Enter the trusted news initiative. Here is the official BBC justification for this intrinsically anti-science, pro-censorship insult to the free exchange of ideas, and an alternative interpretation of this Orwellian bureaucracy.
This intellectual obscenity purports to be able to discern and enforce scientific “truth” by defining truth as that which established public health bureaucracies (and singularly autocratic public health “leaders”) say it is. The trusted news initiative aggressively employs both globally coordinated media and the tools of modern big technology to censor, demean, de-platform, delegitimize and de-license all others who seek to document, advance or discuss alternative versions of officially endorsed reality. The trusted news initiative has functionally morphed into Orwell’s predicted ministry of truth.
Backed by the combined power of national and international governmental structures, massive transnational investment funds the likes of which the world has never seen before, and the commercial assets (Big Pharma, Big Media, Big Tech) over which the funds exert horizontally integrated control through access to investment capital and structural leadership ties.
This is the most intrinsically anti-science global organization ever implemented in the history of modern man. The closest historical approximation to this monstrosity is the Catholic Church during the Spanish inquisition.
When this history of this pandemic is written, the combined effect of the Trusted News Initiative and autocratic national and international public health leaders will be documented as being responsible for massive excess human suffering and loss of life due to suppression of the discussion and dissent which is critical for the modern scientific process to accurately discern evolving truth and inform effective public policy decisions. This must stop, before yet more avoidable, unnecessary suffering and loss of life accrues.
The FDA Wants to Hide Pre-Licensure Data Until You’re Dead and Now the CDC Wants to Hide the Post-Licensure Safety Data
You must take this product. You cannot sue if injured. You can maybe see the clinical trial safety data in 75+ years. And the de-identified post-licensure safety data – no, you cannot see that either.
Aaron Siri
Four things I learned treating patients and fighting for medical freedom in 2021
Dr. Pierre Kory distills lessons that could lead us to a happier destination than where we ended up this year.
After a year like the one we’ve just had, it’s important to take a moment to reflect and distill lessons that may help us change course towards a happier destiny than where we ended up in 2021. There’s a lot I could say about what has been happening, given the state of our country and our medical community, but I will focus on what I see as the four major takeaways to guide us forward:
1. Do no harm does not mean do nothing
Many health care professionals in the U.S. immediately adopted an approach of not trying any treatments until large, expensive and prolonged randomized trials could be performed, so they could have the security of knowing their treatments were recommended by powerful health agencies.
Some of us, meanwhile, got down to the business of medicine, studying the mechanisms of this novel disease and then formulating treatment approaches using readily available medicines with known properties that could counteract these mechanisms. We did everything possible to give patients the best chance of coming out of this disease alive and free from harm. I’m proud to be in this camp because the results speak for themselves.
The ‘maverick’ doctors in the U.S. who took the above-mentioned path experienced both resistance and punishment from our administrative leaders and government managers, while other countries and regions around the world adopted similar approaches with outstanding results.
I frequently cite the example of Uttar Pradesh, one of India's largest states with a population two-thirds the size of the U.S. With a careful door-to-door surveillance strategy in combination with a prevention and early treatment regime using ivermectin, Uttar Pradesh effectively eliminated COVID-19 from their state of 241 million people. The history books will (I hope) rightly recognize their efforts as one of the most successful public health interventions ever.
The Brazilian city of Itajai is another great example. The city offered ivermectin preventively to the entire city’s population; 60 per cent of the population (133,051 people) agreed to take it every two weeks for six months. The city’s health service collected data on the entire population prospectively and found that ivermectin users had a 70 per cent lower mortality rate, and a 67 per cent lower hospitalization rate, while the citywide COVID mortality fell from 6.8 per cent to 1.8 per cent during the program.
Similar results have been seen in places like Mexico, Peru, Argentina, the Philippines, Japan and elsewhere. But in North America, Europe, and Australia, organized, deep-pocketed and highly effective opposition to such programs led to some of the highest case fatality rates in the world. What will the history books say about that?
2. Treating COVID is about more than ivermectin
It’s easy to think of me as “the ivermectin doctor,” but that’s only because the drug is so effective in all phases of COVID-19 that it forms the core therapeutic in the protocols developed by the organization I co-founded, the FLCCC. There are, however, a whole host of other compounds that work to treat COVID-19, either on their own or in combination. All FLCCC doctors pride themselves on these combination protocols, which were carefully constructed to work in synergy.
In addition, it’s important to recognize that colleagues such as Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Umberto Meduri, along with myself, were early advocates for the use of steroids to treat COVID patients — a practice initially discouraged by federal health officials but which has since become the standard of care worldwide. We also had success treating patients with fluvoxamine, a widely used generic antidepressant, in addition to steroids and a number of other repurposed medicines. The protocol contributed to halving deaths in Dr. Marik’s hospital.But the hospital stepped in and banned these medicines, largely restricting their doctors to only using remdesivir; we know it doesn’t work in late phase COVID, and worse, the best studies show it actually may be harming patients.
To show how much the U.S. has lost its way in responding to COVID-19, remdesivir is given to nearly every hospitalized patient at a cost of $3,000 per dose. There are ‘Narco’ states and there are ‘Pharma’ states and the U.S has clearly fallen into the latter category. We must fight to free ourselves from this oppression.
Regarding fluvoxamine, the FLCCC incorporated it into our treatment protocol more than seven months ago, with great effect. That practice was affirmed in October 2021 when a large, double-blind randomized controlled trial, published in The Lancet, found fluvoxamine reduced COVID-19 mortality rates by up to 91 per cent and hospitalizations by two-thirds in those who adhered to the prescribed regimen. This news reinforces the power of safe, inexpensive, repurposed generic medicines to help get this pandemic under control. Yet the NIH continues to avoid recommending this medicine to treat Americans.
It appears these negligent behaviors at the federal level are finally being resisted at the state and local level. An example is now coming from Florida, where the state’s Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, recently launched a public service campaign promoting a healthy lifestyle, better nutrition and early treatment for COVID-19 using many of the compounds in our protocol, including fluvoxamine. While the FLCCC doesn’t take credit for that, it is encouraging to see this kind of move in the country’s third most populous state. Here’s hoping more states follow Florida’s lead in the coming months.
3. Many doctors are too cowardly to speak out
My faith in a lot of things has been weakened since the pandemic began, however, I still believe most doctors go into the profession because they want to help others. I don’t think any doctor wants to see their patients suffer needlessly. So, I really shake my head when I see so many doctors standing by and watching, or even participating in, the pharmaceutical industry’s war on repurposed drugs, dutifully executed via health agencies, medical societies, and state medical boards that scare doctors with bulletins and memos full of threats and fraudulent guidance against using some of the world’s safest (and unfortunately for the industry, most highly effective but unprofitable) medicines. The horrific consequences of their decades-long war against repurposed drugs are clearer than ever before. It must stop. Doctors must resist more effectively, and more cohesively.
“I really shake my head when I see so many doctors standing by and watching, or even participating in, the pharmaceutical industry’s war on repurposed drugs.”
We could have put an end to this pandemic and saved countless lives if many more physicians had spoken up in their individual institutions, prioritizing early treatment approaches guided by the precautionary principle and sound risk-benefit decision making.
Instead, physician leaders in countless institutions allowed public health agencies and institutions to implement a rigid, top-down approach to treatment, threatening physicians with loss of their livelihoods if they didn’t follow their pre-ordained protocols. The physicians’ cowardice in staying silent, while patients suffered and died all around them month after month – just to ensure they could stay employed or maintain peaceful relationships with their peers and superiors – led to terrifying outcomes, just as the history books said they would.
Thankfully, there is a growing number of courageous and outspoken doctors and nurses who are increasingly rising up to do what they are duty-bound to do, and I am honored to count myself among them. These are the people who give me hope and inspire me to keep fighting for the truth no matter how difficult it is sometimes.
To those still on the fence, come on out and march with us on January 23 and see how good it feels to be on the right side of history. Together, we will turn the tide.
4. The powers-that-be can’t keep the truth hidden for long
Here’s where the hope shines through the doom-and-gloom. People are seeing what’s happening, and they’re getting sick of it. Word is getting out. More and more people are questioning the many misguided policies leading to results more obviously disastrous by the day.
Every week, thousands of people tune in to our FLCCC weekly webinar. Around the world more than 20 countries, representing almost one-fifth of the Earth’s population, now use ivermectin. My Twitter following has grown to over 200,000 people! I don’t say this to gloat, but rather to point out that people are hungry for common-sense information they can trust. And I am so proud to be surrounded by a group of pragmatic, caring, thoughtful physicians whose goal is to do just that: use common sense approaches to fight this pandemic.
Dr. Pierre Kory, MD, MPA, is president and chief medical officer of the Front-Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.
Action Alert:
Please email this letter to Dr. Chaudhry as I did and as requested. I added my own comments to it. If you click on the link to this article / open letter, there is a button to push to send an email. Thanks.
An Open Letter to the FDA on Ivermectin and COVID-19 Treatments
Re: Letter to The Federation of State Medical Boards
James Lyons-Weiler
Shannon Glueck, PharmDA
Acting Branch Chief
Branch 4
Division of Compounding II
Office of Compounding Quality and Compliance
Office of Compliance
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
cc: United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and Dr. Chaudhry.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that both the medical community and the general public understand that your letter dated 12/13/2021 to the Federation of State Medical Boards is both misleading and dangerous, as it will lead to a continuation of harmful medical practices and the denial of early, aggressive treatments that have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with disease that results from the infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The public finds your letter to be misguided and spurious, to be point of nearly appearing erratic.
Your counterfactual letter claims that your position is based on a concern that
“Using ivermectin products in preventing or treating COVID-19 may pose risks to patient health or lead to delays in getting effective treatment of COVID-19”
and yet the standard of care for patients who test positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus is to tell patients to go home and wait until they are sick enough to require emergency medical care. This, of course, causes patients to become incubators of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the source of new variants.
Your letter poses ivermectin in a position of competition with other treatments; in fact, no available treatments are in competition with ivermectin, and each has their own risks and weak support; persons who receive monoclonal antibodies may experience worsening COVID-19 if provided too late, and Remdesivir only shows marginal reduction in absolute risk of hospitalization and no change in length of hospital stay. Patients being given Remdesivir and their families are not provided with a list of side effects as required under US and State laws governing informed consent, including that once hospitalized with severe COVID-19, no alternative treatment options other than Remdesivir, oxygen and mechanical ventilation will be considered by the attending medical staff other than palliative care.
It is worth pausing to reflect that there were no studies supporting the safety and efficacy of mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 before it was adopted by hospitals across the United States, and the fact that the allopathic medical community continues to treat severe COVID-19 primarily as pneumonia rather than an immunologic vascular disease show a lack of leadership by FDA, NIH and CDC. Others have stepped in to fill the leadership gap. These experts should be consulted at the earliest possible date, and include Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Peter McCollough, Dr. Paul Marek, and Dr. Harvey Risch, among others.
Your letter incorrectly asserts that “currently available data do not show that ivermectin is safe or effective for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19”. Your letter, however, fails to mention or cite the massive number of studies available that demonstrate a reduction in hospitalizations and deaths associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection via early treatments, including ivermectin. This omission shows a unmistakably callous disregard for scientific evidence in the formation of your policy position.
In fact, the totality of the relevant studies have been laid out for you (and for all of the medical community and the public) at c19early.com since March, 2021, and ivmmeta.com since December, 2020. The peer-reviewed studies are also available to you via the National Library of Medicine (National Center for Biotechnology Information) via the URL pubmed.gov.
The resource c19early.com includes a database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies to date. They report:
“There are currently 138 studies, 90 of which are peer reviewed, 73 with results comparing treatment and control groups. FLCCC provides treatment recommendations. (Four) recently added studies include: Shimizu Mustafa JamirKerr Behl. Ivermectin has been officially adopted for early treatment in all or part of 23 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations).”
The real-time meta-analysis at ivmmeta.com has provided continuously updated meta-analysis of 73 studies and reports that these studies collectively show:
One person in the US may have died from Omicron
It's panic time. We need to go into lockdown immediately except for food and emergencies, shut down the borders, institute mandatory double masking, and make booster shots mandatory for all.
Steve Kirsch
We need to maintain the Emergency, otherwise the EUAs go away
Why would they do this? The EUA expires on Jan 15 and they need an “emergency” to keep the EUA in place.
So Omicron has to be a MAJOR threat to society, otherwise the EUAs go away.
I wonder when people will wake up?
THE SCAMDEMIC WILL MAGICALLY END IN 2022
Mark Oshinskie
…Throughout the past 22 deeply theatrical months, most Americans have ascribed magical “Pandemic(!)” ending powers to a some plainly arbitrary measures. They naively believed the relentless government and media messages that if only we would:
—lock down for two weeks (to “flatten the curve!”)
—wear masks (“because my mask protects you!” or something like that)
—disinfect everything (even though the virus doesn’t spread via surfaces)
—walk in one direction in supermarket aisles (because your mask doesn’t really work)
—stay six feet apart (see above, plus four feet is not enough)
—close small businesses (while leaving large ones open)
—test and trace (because what works for STDs also works for respiratory viruses…not)
—stay in our home states (even though the infection rates were nearly equal)
—elect Biden (because, like Nixon, he had a secret plan to end “The Pandemic(!)”)
-—vaxx! (because it’s “safe and effective and will stop the spread!”)
—avoid family at Christmas (because people should be even more miserable)
—wear masks! (unless you’re consuming food or beverages)
—continue to uncritically obey the authorities (although nothing they said, worked)
—vaxx again!! (and blame the unvaxxed for continuing infections)
—return to restaurants, theaters and stadiums (but only to half of capacity)
—keep schools closed (even though kids were never at risk)
—test even more (though the tests are 90% inaccurate, we need to keep scaring people)
—vaxx / boost yet again!!! (about 100,000+ people have died, been hospitalized of injured after injecting; and keep scapegoating and hectoring the unvaxxed, and require them to vaxx, even though the vaxxed are getting infected, spreading infection and dying)
….we could “CRUSH THE VIRUS!” (Yay, Us!)
Actually, the lockdowns, masks and first round of vaxxes were, by themselves, supposed to get this done. The other measures were, well, just more “Science!” Conveyed by “Experts!”
People, how clueless and gullible can you have been/still be? None of this worked. None of it could ever have worked. Learn some Microbiology. You’re surrounded, and even inhabited by, microbes. You always have been. You always will be. The world cannot be made sterile. You wouldn’t survive in a world without a wide array of bacteria, fungi, protozoa and viruses. You have to co-exist with microbes.
To paraphrase what the good witch said to Dorothy at the end of The Wizard of Oz, the power to end the Scamdemic was always within your power.
If only you had (and now I’m being serious):
—turned off your TVs and radios, Twitter and Facebook and instead believed your own eyes and your own data sets comprising only people you knew.
—considered that very old, very sick or very overweight people were at any risk.
—known that asymptomatic spread was very rare
—weighed the impact of lockdowns and school closures on people besides your lazy, commute-avoiding, laptop-using, fully-paid or subsidized self.
—focused on making your body healthier, instead of eating and drinking whatever you wanted and sitting all day.
—educated yourselves about inexpensive, preventive supplements and cheap, safe, effective therapeutics with the same level of focus that you apply to learning about sports teams, celebrities, politics, investments, fashion and gossip.
—disobeyed governmental restrictions on your assembly and movement.
—refused to be injected with experimental, ineffective, harmful substances.
—realized that sometimes some old and unhealthy people pass from this Earth
…this whole thing would have been over in a month. Or less.
A new year calendar doesn’t matter. Only your decision to either comply with, or to resist, all of the continuing foolishness, propaganda and political theater does.