Segregation and Discrimination
Segregation and Discrimination
in the USA and the World
From Jonathon Otto…
When governments aren’t scaring people into getting vaccinated, they’re bribing them.
Several states have implemented “incentives”, such as automatic lottery entries to vaccinated individuals, while others offer free beer and doughnuts. In New York, Governor Kathy Hochul is conducting a six-week "Ski for Free" Vaccine Sweepstakes to “bolster” C_V_D-19 vaccination rates for children ages 5 to 11.
While Gov. Hochul considers this as an “incentive”, it's pretty clear this is bribery. And New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio recently started requiring children ages 5 to 11 to show proof of, at least, their first C_V_D vaccination before entering any indoor dining, fitness, entertainment, and performance venues.
This further isolates unvaccinated children who don’t understand that their parents have their best interests in mind. Their parents are portrayed as the “bad guys” who won’t let them participate in the same fun activities as their friends.
Under the guise of trying to “protect children”, heavy-handed governments have subjected them to endless lockdowns, social isolation, family separations, and massive disruptions to their education. When children are actually allowed to enter their classrooms, they’re required to be masked for several hours each day.
And now children are being pressured into receiving C_V_D vaccines — or miss out on the few joys they have left.
I can’t even wrap my head around mandating children to get vaccinated. This is troubling on so many levels.
I’d also like to share this post from The Defender (Children's Health Defense's website) on why children should NOT be vaccinated.
The article was written by Dr. Robert Malone, the man who invented the mRNA technology. In this post, he shared why 16,000 physicians and scientists have agreed it's not good for kids to get vaccinated. It's clear that the effects of these mRNA vaccines are irreversible and can be permanently damaging.
What are the aberrant covid-19 countermeasures?
"For the unvaccinated, you’re looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families, and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm"
The Ignorant
Some of the blatant aberrant countermeasures leading to doomsday statements such as "For the unvaccinated, you’re looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families, and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm":
FDA changed the vaccine definition (among other things replaced ‘produced immunity’ with ‘produce protection’). The covid-19 vaccines did not meet the old ‘vaccine’ definition and the new ‘vaccine’ definition fits the covid-19 vaccine weak immune response.
The vaccine does not work as advertised as the vaccines allow transmission and breakthrough infections and diseases. How people were fooled in the spring of 2021 “Vaccine developers often hope that, in addition to preventing illness, their vaccines will achieve “sterilizing immunity,” where the vaccination blocks the germ from even being able to get into the body at all”. Hope is the key word for mass vaccination
OSHA removed the requirement to report vaccine adverse reactions to encourage vaccination rates.
Vaccine short time 'protection' is not explained. There is no scientific explanation why the covid-19 vaccine offer ‘protection’ only for couple of months
Emergency used authorization is used for vaccine mandates while the EUA explicitly make any treatment optional
FDA COMIRNATY BLA is not available. If available, then all EUA covid-19 treatments / vaccines must be removed from the market
Natural immunity, preventive and early treatments are not recognized
Omicron infects mostly the vaccinated and boosted while the governments mandate the booster or vaccines. Omicron variant found in more vaccinated people.
RT-PCR tests generate mostly false positives as per WHO when run with high cycle thresholds. Cycle thresholds were not reported with the RT-PCR tests. Even CDC withdrew the RT-PCR
Lockdowns, vaccine mandates, vaccine passports & "othering" of those that don't comply. It's all unfolding across the globe and even right here in the land of the free.
Would you have believed 2 years ago, that this could happen?
Dr. Naomi Wolf did - over fourteen years ago! In her 2007 book "The End of America", Dr. Wolf lay out the 10 steps to authoritarianism, highlighting the rise of tyrants of the past, and connecting their strategies to our modern age. In "Give Me Liberty", the sequel, Dr. Wolf sounded the call for citizens to engage directly in protecting our freedoms.
With DailyClout, Dr. Wolf is bringing tools and information to citizens to make it easy for all of us to be activists and lobbyists.
There is much more to do. DailyClout is in the vanguard, enabling citizens and activists to share their stories with the world, without fear of censorship.
Just look at how the Vaccine Injured are being treated. Ignored, attacked, deplatformed, By liberals in most cases, defending the rights of Big Pharma Companies to avoid any and all liability for the extreme adverse effects of their products. Products that are being mandated by the government, to go to work, to go to school, to eat dinner in a restaurant. To live any type of life.
CDC Manipulates Data
The CDC continues to manipulate the data on C_V_D cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by v@ccination status to push their unending narrative that the vaccines are safe, effective, and must be mandated.
Yet the official data from England and Scotland shows how TWICE as many people have died from C_V_D-19 V@CCINES in 6 months than people who have died from the C_V_D-19 virus in 15 months.
How can there be such a huge discrepancy in the data and the conclusions drawn from them?
The vast majority of deaths reported as “C_V_D deaths”, are in people who already had serious health conditions - “comorbidities” - such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease, cancer, and dementia.
In the UK, there were 87,253 deaths within 28 days of a positive test from January 1 - June 10, 2021. However, only 3,591 of these people died from C_V_D, whereas 83,662 deaths were in people with chronic, pre-existing comorbidities.
It’s possible that they were added to the C_V_D death statistics because they received a positive test result within 28 days of their death. UK Hospitals mandate PCR tests, which often produce false positives.
So how can we know whether tens of thousands of deaths in very sick, often elderly, people were truly from C_V_D?
Also in the UK, people who have died due to the C_V_D vaccines are counted as vaccinated deaths only if the death occurred within 28 days of receiving the shot.
So, what about all the people who die from C_V_D vaccines after 28 days?
In the US, people who have died due to the C_V_D vaccines within the first 14 days after receiving a shot are counted as unvaccinated deaths, not as vaccinated. Why? Because the CDC counts someone as “fully vaccinated”:
2 weeks after their second dose in a 2-dose series, such as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or
2 weeks after a single-dose vaccine, such as Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine
Anyone that does not meet these requirements is counted as NOT fully vaccinated – in other words, unvaccinated.
READ THE CDC’S “WHEN YOU’VE BEEN FULLY VACCINATED”
So in the US, if someone dies from either vaccine side effects or from C_V_D within 14 days of getting Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine or within as much as 8 weeks of getting the first dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, and they test positive for C_V_D, their death is counted as an “unvaccinated” one.
Since the majority of deaths from the shots occur within that time frame, the CDC enables itself to report a higher number of deaths among the “unvaccinated” and a lower number among the “vaccinated”, thus bolstering its propaganda that this is now a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”
Did you know that the CDC guidelines for the C_V_D-19 test swabs and nasal probes are different for vaccinated persons than for the unvaccinated?
Newsweek
The documents, obtained by Freedom of Information Act requests, show that the NIH was funding research at the Wuhan lab that involved manipulating coronaviruses in ways that could have made them more transmissible and deadly to humans—work that arguably fits the definition of gain-of-function. The documents establish that top NIH officials were concerned that the work may have crossed a line the U.S. government had drawn against funding such risky research. The funding came from the NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which Dr. Fauci heads.
The resistance among Dr. Fauci and other NIH officials to be forthcoming with information that could inform the debate over the origins of COVID-19 illustrates the old Watergate-era saw that the coverup is often worse than the crime.
Attorney General document
“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”
— William Wilberforce
Must We Segregate the Unvaccinated from the Vaccinated?
by Paul Elias Alexander | Guest Writer
Governments around the world have encouraged and enforced a new form of segregation based on vaccine status. This is not only dangerously inhumane; there is no scientific basis for this.
There seems to be an underlying presumption here that the unvaccinated are unclean (regardless of natural immunity) and their presence will spread disease. What if, however, existing studies reveal that there is little to no difference between the COVID vaccinated and unvaccinated in terms of becoming infected, harboring the virus (viral load in the oral and nasopharynx), and transmitting it?
As it relates to Omicron, two recent small but interesting preliminary studies show that 80 percent of the omicron cases were double vaccinated. Wilhelm et al. reported on reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant by vaccine sera and monoclonal antibodies. “in vitro findings using authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants indicate that in contrast to the currently circulating Delta variant, the neutralization efficacy of vaccine-elicited sera against Omicron was severely reduced highlighting T-cell mediated immunity as essential barrier to prevent severe COVID-19.”
Further, the CDC has reported on the details for 43 cases of COVID-19 attributed to the Omicron variant. They found that “34 (79 percent) occurred in persons who completed the primary series of an FDA-authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine ≥14 days before symptom onset or receipt of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result.”
As it relates to the vaccinated and unvaccinated being similar in terms of infection, viral load, and transmission capacity, and thus no underlying evidence to separate them societally, we specifically focus on and present (and based largely on Delta variant data) the body of evidence.
1) Salvatore et al. examined the transmission potential of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a federal prison, July-August 2021. They found a total of 978 specimens were provided by 95 participants, “of whom 78 (82 percent) were fully vaccinated and 17 (18 percent) were not fully vaccinated… clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons.”
2) Singanayagam et al. examined the transmission and viral load kinetics in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with mild delta variant infection in the community. They found that (in 602 community contacts (identified via the U.K, contract-tracing system) of 471 U.K. COVID-19 index cases were recruited to the Assessment of Transmission and Contagiousness of COVID-19 in Contacts cohort study and contributed 8,145 upper respiratory tract samples from daily sampling for up to 20 days) “vaccination reduces the risk of delta variant infection and accelerates viral clearance. Nonetheless, fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts.”
3) Chia et al. reported that PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values were “similar between both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups at diagnosis, but viral loads decreased faster in vaccinated individuals. Early, robust boosting of anti-spike protein antibodies was observed in vaccinated patients, however, these titers were significantly lower against B.1.617.2 as compared with the wildtype vaccine strain.”
4) Israel, 2021 looked at Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection, and reported as “To determine the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, or SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated individuals…In vaccinated subjects, antibody titers decreased by up to 40 percent each subsequent month while in convalescents they decreased by less than five percent per month. Six months after BNT162b2 vaccination 16.1 percent subjects had antibody levels below the sero-positivity threshold of <50 AU/mL, while only 10.8 percent of convalescent patients were below <50 AU/mL threshold after 9 months from SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
5) In the UK COVID-19 vaccine Surveillance Report for week #42, it was noted that there is “waning of the N antibody response over time” and “that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.” The same report (Table 2, page 13), shows that in the older age groups above 30, the double vaccinated persons have greater infection risk than the unvaccinated, presumably because the latter group include more people with stronger natural immunity from prior COVID disease. See also UK PHE reports 43, 44, 45, 46 for similar data.
6) In Barnstable, Massachusetts, Brown et al. found that among 469 cases of COVID-19, 74 percent were fully vaccinated, and that “the vaccinated had on average more virus in their nose than the unvaccinated who were infected.”
This article was originally published by the Brownstone Institute. Paul Elias Alexander holds a PhD. He has experience in epidemiology and in the teaching clinical epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former Assistant professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine and research methods; former COVID Pandemic evidence-synthesis consultant advisor to WHO-PAHO Washington, DC and former senior advisor to COVID Pandemic policy in Health and Human Services (HHS).
It just got personal
Covid hits home
Justin Hart
Nope, I didn’t catch the Omicron, family members are healthy… but Covid impacted us in a way that might change the trajectory of our lives for the next few years.
We have a Brady Bunch family Jenny & I. We have 8 kids between us. 3 of them are ours (ages 4, 3, and 4 months). She has two daughters 18 and 13 and I have 3 older kids - the youngest is 18. So 4 kids are usually traipsing about the halls getting ready for school — but all of that changed this week.
Our 13-year-old’s private school sent us a note that she would have to quarantine at home for the rest of 2021. Why? Because someone in the school musical had tested positive for Covid. Because our daughter is unvaccinated she had no recourse - she would miss the rest of school in December including the Christmas concert. She was devastated.
Of course, her friends who are vaccinated can go about their merry way and back to school.
Of course, the student who contracted Covid was FULLY VACCINATED himself.
Of course, test-to-stay was not an option per policy because the students weren’t masked at the play practice.
Of course, no one is sick.
Of course, NONE OF THIS MAKES ANY SENSE.
I was livid — and I still am. This is a private school here in San Diego and the only high school to remain open the entire 2020-21 school season. Jenny has sent her daughters there for 12+ years and so it’s devastating because we will have to part ways from them. Their mission lacks courage and is not aligned with our values.
Why is it that I have to FIGHT with the school to keep my daughter in classes!?
On TOP of that drama the state licensing board is coming down hard on our kids’ pre-school. The director of this pre-school (which has been operating for 38 years!) is determined to fight to keep masks off of our kids. She knows the learning detriment they cause. (Try teaching a 4-year-old how to pronounce the letter “H” through a mask!).
The licensing folks made a surprise visit to the school. In a proud-papa moment apparently they asked aloud to the kids why so many of them weren’t wearing a mask. My 4-year-old replied: “Because my dad filled out a form and I don’t have to and he doesn’t believe in them!”
Well, that didn’t go down well with those folks and they are currently threatening to shut down the school.
I’ve been working with the school to raise funds and find lawyers to fight this. In the end, we are out of time. The kids must have a legit medical note attached to their file to avoid masking.
When we went to the pediatrician to ask for it and got this reply: (read more at link below)…
Unvaccinated Europeans Fight for Rights as COVID Restrictions Tighten
December 20, 2021 | Best in Video
"Well, they’re living under lockdown, with no full access to society or jobs. They’re also facing fines and even jail. That’s what the unvaccinated are up against in many European countries, and the backlash is growing. …When I talked to American Alicia Durin and her German husband Andreas, they were packing, trying to get out of Germany as quickly as possible with their three children. They’ve had enough of Germany’s strict COVID policies."
This is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.