Stopping the Mandates
Demand: "No Jab Mandates!"
A recent ruling by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals that reinstated Democrats' COVID tyranny has intensified the fight to stop Joe Biden's forced vaccination of America. Three days before Christmas, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made a stunning, but welcomed, announcement. Justices will hear oral arguments January 7 challenging two of the Biden regime's vaccine mandates.
On December 8, the Senate passed a resolution nullifying a Joe Biden vaccine mandate that affected some 80 million Americans.You can call on the House of Representatives to follow the Senate's lead. Urge key lawmakers to force Speaker Nancy Pelosi to vote on a House resolution that would defund and repeal the Biden regime's unconstitutional, COVID-immunization requirements BEFORE next week's emergency SCOTUS session.
+ + Urgent Action Needed: Send Your "No Jab Mandates!" Letters, Phone Calls and Emails Now!
If you agree that Big Government should NOT force anyone to be immunized, you can take immediate action to demand Reps stop the Biden regime from resorting to "vaccine tyranny" and violating Americans' constitutional rights.
Another federal court has ruled against Joe Biden's forced vaccination of America. Last week, a judge for the U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas ordered a halt to vaccine and mask mandates for the government's Head Start preschool programs.
The new rules issued last month require children over 2 in Head Start programs to wear masks, while the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is requiring staff, contractors and volunteers in the program to be vaccinated by the end of January.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will hear oral arguments THIS FRIDAY (January 7) challenging two of Joe Biden's COVID "jab" mandates. The federal judge in the Texas ruling concluded: "(T)here is a substantial likelihood that the mandates do not fit within the Head Start Act’s authorizing text... and that the mandates are arbitrary and capricious."
The first dispute will examine whether the Biden regime's vaccine-or-test requirement for workers at companies with more than 100 employees violates the constitutional rights of Americans. The other challenge is to an immunization mandate for health-care workers at facilities that receive federal funding.
SCOTUS announced this rare, "emergency" session as coronavirus cases were increasing nationwide and with the Omicron variant (Joe Biden's new COVID "boogeyman") dominating headlines. Fear mongers want you to believe that the new COVID variant could be a death sentence for you and your loved ones if you refuse vaccines and boosters.
Troubling data about Pfizer's Covid vaccine and children... from Pfizer's own clinical trial
Pfizer’s vaccine shows dose-related side effects in children; still, the company is letting five-year-olds receive an mRNA dosage that caused serious fevers in slightly younger kids.
Alex Berenson
Reports of COVID Vaccine Injuries Pass 1 Million Mark, FDA Signs Off on Pfizer Booster for Kids 12 and Up
VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,000,229 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 21,002 deaths and 162,506 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021.
The data included a total of 21,002 reports of deaths and 162,506 reports of serious injuries. Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 709,084 adverse events, including 9,623 deaths and 62,069 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021.
Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.
Of the 9,623 U.S. deaths reported as of Dec. 24, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 25% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
In the U.S., 499.7 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Dec. 23. This includes 291 million doses of Pfizer, 190 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Dec. 24, 2021, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:
5,706 adverse events, including 114 rated as serious and 2 reported deaths.
11 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).
14 reports of blood clotting disorders.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Dec. 24, 2021, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
25,802 adverse events, including 1,506 rated as serious and 34 reported deaths.
The most recent death involves a previously healthy 15-year-old girl from Wisconsin (VAERS I.D. 1963633), who experienced a cerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to a ruptured aneurysm. She also tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 despite having been fully vaccinated.
61 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases
attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.579 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 568 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
146 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Dec. 10, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:
19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
54% of those who died were male, 41% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.
The average age of death was 72.3.
As of Dec. 24, 4,692 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1,487 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
Of the 3,358 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizervaccinations, 41% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
815 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with 41% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 29% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.
2,241 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
12,070 reports of blood clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 5,341 reportswere attributed to Pfizer, 4,302 reports to Moderna and 2,275 reports to J&J.
3,405 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,379 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,197 cases to Moderna and 152 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.
FDA clears Pfizer boosters for 12- to 15-year-olds, bypasses experts
The FDA today amended Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s COVID vaccine expanding eligibility for boosters to children 12 through 15 years of age.
The agency did not consult its expert panel of vaccine advisors, who in September, overwhelmingly rejected boosters for healthy people 16 and older.
The FDA also shortened the time for both adolescents and adults to receive a booster from six months to five months after receiving a second dose and authorized a third shot for immunocompromised children aged 5 to 11.
Dr. Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, said in a statement the agency made its decision because a third dose “may help provide better protection against both the Delta and Omicronvariants.”
The FDA said it reviewed real-world data from Israel of more than 6,300 individuals 12- to 15-years-old who received a booster at least five months after their second Pfizer dose and found no serious safety concerns.
Likewise, additional data showed no problems giving anyone eligible for a Pfizer booster an extra dose at five months instead of six, the Associated Press reported.
The FDA said it will continue to review the information and communicate with the public if data emerges suggesting booster doses are needed for the younger pediatric population.
Pediatrician weighs in on FDA decision: children aren’t ‘mini-adults’
Dr. Michelle Perro, pediatrician and co-author of “What’s Making Our Children Sick,” disagreed with the FDA’s decision, pointing out that “children are not mini-adults.” In an email to The Defender, Perro said children’s rapid growth, quick cellular turnover and less efficient detoxification pathways are factors that must be considered whenever any new therapeutics are being introduced.
Perro said:
“This newest immunomodulating therapy, the mRNA inoculation, has already been shown to have produced multisystem negative health outcomes in children garnered from the CDC’s own database.”
Perro outlined five reasons she believes this “experimental therapy” must be immediately withdrawn:
Gene-edited injectables have not been adequately studied in children as per Pfizer’s own data, where they meshed childrens’ and adults’ data together.
The injection utilizes nanotechnology which is now part of the emerging technology in vaccinology research. These nanoparticles are so small in size they can cross the blood-brain barrier which can adversely affect our already fragile population of children.
The mRNA itself is unstable and is thus encapsulated in a lipid biosphere comprised of a polyethylene glycol shell which in itself is toxic.
The number of children suffering from already documented irreparable side effects from the inoculations, such as those occurring in their hearts (myocarditis), is not only unacceptable but immoral.
Children’s healthcare providers are neither educated or proactive in diagnosing and treating the effects from this experimental therapy.
Perro questioned the FDA’s motives, given that children suffer nearly zeromorbidity and mortality from COVID infections.
She also said the FDA is “veering from” its own historical stance.
“When previous true vaccines were introduced historically (rotavirus vaccine), after just a few cases of adversity, they were immediately withdrawn,” Perro told The Defender. “The FDA must adhere to its own historical position regarding their assigned task of the protection and oversight of our country’s greatest asset: our children.”
Fauci says hospitalization numbers for kids with COVID are overcounted
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in an interview on MSNBC, said statistics for hospitalizations among children with COVID are overcounted, making clear the distinction between children hospitalized with COVID and children hospitalized “because of COVID.”
Speaking to MSNBC’s Ayman Mohyeldin, who was filling in for Rachel Maddow on Dec. 29, about the rise in hospitalizations among children amid the Omicron variant, Fauci said the surge is due to two contributing factors — more children getting infected and the way COVID cases are counted.
“And what we mean by that — if a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID. And they get counted as a COVID-hospitalized individual,” Fauci said. “When in fact, they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or something like that. So it’s overcounting the number of children who are, quote, ‘hospitalized with COVID,’ as opposed to because of COVID.”
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin tests positive for COVID after three doses
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin tested positive for COVID, and will remain at home for the next five days “in accordance with new CDC guidelines.”
In an emailed statement released Sunday night, Austin said he is fully vaccinated and received his booster dose in October, which he claimed made the infection “much more mild.”
Austin said vaccines work and will remain a medical requirement for the military’s workforce. A lawsuit challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate is working its way through the courts, and plaintiffs on Dec. 10 filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction against the requirement until the court rules on the case.
People getting unapproved fourth and fifth doses of COVID boosters
Some people with compromised immune systems are sidestepping government guidelines to receive unapproved fourth or fifth COVID shots, despite uncertainty about their safety or effectiveness, The New York Times reported.
The CDC in October 2021 updated its guidelines, allowing immunocompromised people to receive a fourth dose six months after a third, but the earliest eligibility for a fourth dose would be late February.
In order to administer COVID vaccines, medical providers must sign a legal agreement with the CDC that states they could be kicked out of the vaccination program or face prosecution for breaking the agency’s rules.
Yet, the government has not enforced compliance with regulations and seems unlikely to pursue punishments for most providers, according to legal experts.
Israel has already begun administering fourth doses, becoming the first country in the world to roll out additional shots.
Prime Minister Naftali Bennett announced on Sunday the country would offer a fourth dose to individuals with weakened immune systems, people aged 60 and over and medical workers who had their last jab at least four months ago.
Novavax files data with FDA for Emergency Use Authorization
Novavax last week filed final data with the FDA for its COVID vaccine, fulfilling the final prerequisite to apply for EUA of NVX-CoV2373, the company’s recombinant nanoparticle protein-based COVID vaccine with Matrix-M adjuvant.
If all goes well, the Maryland-based biotech company expects to submit a request for EUA in the U.S. in one month in accordance with FDA guidance.
“Novavax is committed to delivering our protein-based vaccine in the United States, where the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve with the emergence of new variants,” Stanley Erck, president and CEO of Novavax, said in a statement.
Novavax is partnering with the Serum Institute of India, one of the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world, and uses the COVID spike protein pulled from the very first strain of the virus. The company boasts a vaccine efficacy of about 90%.
Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.
Attention All Attorneys Being Mandated to Receive an Unwanted Medical Procedure
You may feel at home at my firm of over 25 professionals
Aaron Siri
If you are being mandated by your law firm to receive a medical procedure you don’t want, maybe it is time to move to a firm that respects your medical decisions.
My firm, Siri & Glimstad LLP (www.sirillp.com), is always looking for excellent and motivated attorneys with litigation experience to work on our civil rights matters, mostly involving mandated medical products, as well as our other practice areas, including class actions and mass torts. We also welcome attorneys that simply need a home for their practice at a firm that will not force them to eat their veggies and take their jabs.
FLCCC Lawyer to NY Attorney General: Your Overreach is Showing—Badly
New York Attorney General Letitia James’ “cease and desist” letters to doctors prescribing ivermectin are riddled with falsehoods
Joyce Kamen and FLCCC Alliance
On November 23, 2021, the office of Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, issued a letter to physicians listed as telehealth providers on the FLCCC website. She warned these doctors – many of whom were from other states – that they must “cease and desist” from prescribing ivermectin to residents of New York State; and that they must amend their telehealth “advertisement” on the FLCCC website to indicate they do NOT serve residents of the state of New York.
The letter further threatened that failure to comply with the Attorney General’s directive could result in a lawsuit seeking to “enjoin deceptive acts”; and to seek restitution, damages and penalties of up to $5,000 for each violation.
The “deceptive acts” to which the AG referred were outlined in the letter. (Note: All of the following noted by the AG are demonstrably FALSE, as evidenced by peer-reviewed science.)
FALSEHOOD #1: Providers of ivermectin are misleading consumers as to the effectiveness of ivermectin for COVID-19.
FACT: The effectiveness of ivermectin has been proven in over 70 scientific trials.
FALSEHOOD #2: Adverse effects associated with ivermectin are increasing, as shown in a rise in calls to poison control centers reporting overdoses and adverse effects.
FACT: After the New York Times reported that the Mississippi State Department of Health attributed 70% of its calls to ivermectin adverse events, they were forced to retract the figures. In fact, the ivermectin-related calls to the Mississippi State Department of Health represented only 2% of the totalcalls; and that 70% of those calls (1.4% of all calls) were from people who ingested veterinary grade ivermectin. (NOTE: The FLCCC has consistently advised against the use of animal-grade ivermectin.)
FALSEHOOD #3: The National Institutes of Health has determined that there is insufficient evidence to recommend ivermectin for COVID-19
FACT: The NIH has a “neutral” stance on IVM use.
Very soon after the issuance of that letter, doctors listed on our website who provide telehealth for residents of New York began sending us the copies they received. Understandably, many asked to be removed from our website, or to have their listings amended to exclude provision of services to New York residents.
The “deceptive acts” these doctors were accused of providing were, in actuality, courageous acts of life-saving compassion. Robust epidemiological studiesfrom around the world validate the science in the real world and point to the effectiveness of preventive protocols based around ivermectin. But the well-coordinated and well-funded media campaign against ivermectin has strangled true science and caused the senseless deaths of hundreds of thousands.
Upon reading the AG’s letter, the physicians and scientists on our team immediately knew that Ms. James had “leapt before she looked” by failing to evaluate, investigate —or even acknowledge— any of the peer-reviewed and published scientific data that overwhelmingly support ivermectin-related protocols in radically lowering COVID-19 related hospitalizations and death. Instead, the AG mindlessly parroted the severely compromised—and profit motivated—Big Pharma/FDA narrative that the vaccines are forever and always the only solution to the pandemic; and now maybe some new, and of course, extremely expensive antiviral drugs that have neither the efficacy nor the safety profiles of ivermectin. (The vaccines are but one of many solutions.)
For advice on how to provide guidance to our telehealth doctors, we turned to our esteemed legal counsel, Alan Dumoff. On our behalf, Alan wrote a response letter to the New York Attorney General’s office to address the gross misconceptions and twisted science that was masquerading as fact by the AG’s office.
This letter and its powerful legal, scientific and ethical arguments can be utilized by doctors and nurses prescribing ivermectin to New York residents – or to the residents of any state that attempts to dictate to health care providers how they can or cannot treat their patients.
Alan Dumoff’s entire letter is found HERE. The link to the references and attachments is HERE.
With vs From: The Debate Goes Mainstream-Part 1
What % of patients are in the hospital from ailments related to Covid versus in the hospital and just happen to test positive with Covid. The debate is out in the open now.
Justin Hart
With Dr. Fauci’s admission that children currently hospitalized as Omicron patients are probably there for some reason altogether unrelated to Covid. They are patients “with” Covid rather than “from” Covid. This is an argument Team Reality has been making for a very long time so it’s nice of our health overlords to join the discussion.
One of our Twitter colleagues, Brock Burt, crafted a masterful and lengthy thread about this topic and described the evidence. We reproduce it for you below:
