Sweden, testing, lies, oh my
The Project Veritas Document Was Real; It Originated With D.R.A.S.T.I.C
No, it was not about "viruses" it was about vaccines. For the BATS. To develop aerosolized and transdermal spike protein vaccines for bats in China. Ask yourself: Why?
Celia Farber
this may be the biggest cover-up since the Pentagon Papers. Millions and millions of people have died from this disease. This is clearly a lab-leak, whether intentional or not. People need to be held accountable. What happened must be determined - a Congressional investigation is needed. If there are crimes, they must be prosecuted. The Veritas papers change everything.
Scientists believed Covid leaked from Wuhan lab - but feared debate could hurt ‘international harmony’ The Telegraph, January 12, 2022
Bombshell Admission — The COVID Tests Don’t Work
Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not as a valid diagnostic and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on “dead,” nonreplicating viral debris
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now admits the PCR test can remain positive for up to 12 weeks after infection. For this reason, they say most people don’t need to retest negative before ending their quarantine
The CDC also admits the PCR cannot identify active infection or measure contagiousness
People who are double-jabbed or unvaccinated and test positive for SARS-CoV-2, or have known exposure, but remain asymptomatic, now only need to isolate for five days rather than 10, but should wear a mask for another five days when at work or in public. People who are triple-jabbed do not need to isolate after exposure, but should wear a mask for 10 days
Health care workers who test positive for COVID but remain asymptomatic can return to work after seven days with a negative test, but isolation time can be cut to five days if there are staffing shortages
Neither of them offered any explanation as for why the CDC didn’t change the rules sooner, and only now decided that keeping noninfectious people in isolation for days and weeks on end might not be so good after all.
Walensky did make a rather telling comment on CNN, though, when asked about the reasoning behind the shortened isolation guidance. “It really had a lot to do with what we thought people would be able to tolerate,” she said. Some have understandably translated that as “how much tyranny we thought people would be able to tolerate.
Differing Rules for Health Care Workers
The CDC has not given up on making the guidance as confusing as possible though. December 23, 2021, they also updated guidance for health care workers, stating that “Health care workers with COVID-19 who are asymptomatic can return to work after seven days with a negative test, and that isolation time can be cut further if there are staffing shortages.
In his MSNBC interview, Fauci was asked why health care workers are being treated differently, having to isolate for seven days rather than five, and still have to get a negative test, when the test can falsely remain positive for up to 12 weeks? What data supports this, and is it publicly available?
According to Fauci, the data to support this difference “is internal to the CDC,” but really, there’s “no specific data” to back it up, he adds. The CDC merely made “a judgment call.”
Double-Jabbed Treated the Same as Unvaccinated
The CDC’s updated guidance also puts those who have received two doses of the COVID shot in the same category as the unvaccinated, so when it comes to isolating after exposure, they have to follow the same rules, whereas those who have received a booster shot follow a different set of guidelines.
…What’s the Real Death Count?
The CDC’s belated admission that the PCR test can’t identify active infection raises another question: What does this mean for those who died with a positive test? Did they actually have an active infection? If not, should they have been designated as COVID deaths?
The obvious answer to the last two questions is, of course, no. The vast majority were likely false positives, and the real death toll from COVID-19 considerably lower than we’re led to believe. The CDC undoubtedly knew this all along, seeing how they’ve been relentlessly criticized for their recommendation to run the PCR at a CT of 40. They’re trying to pretend that they just realized this, but that’s simply not believable.
Dr Robert Malone, inventor of the MRNA technology was Permanently Banned From Twitter
Malone had been permanently banned from Twitter the day before, December 29, 2021. He suspects his ban was triggered by one of the two last posts he made. One was a link to the Canadian COVID Care Alliance’s website, with the comment:
“Pfizer 6 month data which shows that Pfizer's Covid-19 inoculations cause more illness than they prevent. Plus, an overview of the Pfizer trial flaws in both design and execution.”
The video, More Harm Than Good, featured on the Canadian COVID Care Alliance’s website, reviews that Pfizer data. They exposed the fraud of Pfizer’s clinical COVID jab trial.
The other tweet that might have triggered the ban was a post about how the World Economic Forum manages global media in a lockstep fashion. Either way, Malone was permanently banned from the social media platform either for highlighting Pfizer’s own science — the very science we’re told to “trust” — or highlighting the WEF’s central role in the global censorship campaign.
Joe Rogan's interview with Dr. Robert Malone was, without question, one of the most important interviews of 2021.
Congressman Troy E. Nehls (R-TX-22) entered the transcript of the Joe Rogan Experience #1757 – Interview with Dr. Robert Malone, MD into the Congressional Record after Twitter and YouTube removed the interview from their platforms. Dr. Malone is a widely published mRNA vaccine expert who went on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast to raise concerns over the COVID-19 vaccine. Twitter’s move to deplatform Dr. Malone and remove the interview from their site is the latest in a string of censuring individuals who dissent against the COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine mandates.
“By deplatforming Dr. Robert Malone for voicing opposition and removing the interview, Twitter and YouTube are once again proving that they don’t work for their users but for big Pharma, big media, and the elites,” said Congressman Nehls. “When we stray away from our core principles of freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of debate, democracy is lost. Today, I entered the transcript of the Joe Rogan Experience #1757 into the Congressional Record to preserve the podcast forever. Big Tech may be able to censor information on their own platforms, but they cannot censor the Congressional Record.”
more perspective on sweden and the lies we were told
a preliminary look at 2021 full year all cause mortality
…the killer was lockdowns and societal panic.
suicide is up, drug overdoses are up, depression has soared.
many, many medical appointments were missed.
cancer diagnoses plummeted but the cancer did not. so it went late stage and now people are dying of cancers that might have been curable if discovered 18 months ago.
heart disease is up, obesity is up, and deaths from diabetes, which got out of control in 2020-1 are WAY up.
these are the effects of policy, not of covid. they are the awful butcher’s bill of political stupidity and cupidity and the people who did this warrant extraordinary blame.
this was not public health, it was mass derangement.
the media that sought to vilify and disparage sweden and call their policy murder are complicit in what turned out to be the actual killing. they aided, abetted, and outright cheer led for it perhaps because they were stupid, perhaps because they were partisan, perhaps because they just thrive on carnage and that which bleeds inevitably leads.
but they were desperately, devastatingly wrong.
and we all need to remember that. because they’re not going to change. so we must.
their silence on sweden is now deafening
…the will sweep this and their ignominious failure and malicious misbehavior under the rug.
the NYT in particular has a rich history of siding with fascists and totalitarians. they loved mussolini, loved hitler, loved stalin. hitler won time’s “man of the year.” stalin won twice.
do you think today is any different?
media loves authoritarianism because it elevates them to policy level status as propaganda ministries. they fall all over themselves to join.
the new breed is no better and they will similarly seek to hide what they have done and the evidence of their thumbs upon the scales of discourse.
so we must remember.
and we must learn.
and we must never, never trust these people again.
because they lie.
Serious Issues With At-Home Tests
Pamela A. Popper, President
Wellness Forum Health
On July 21, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) announced that on December 31 the agency would be withdrawing its request to the FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the PCR test for detection of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The CDC wrote that the agency was providing advance notice so that laboratories and institutions would have enough time to choose other tests approved by the FDA.
On another CDC site, the agency promotes home tests for COVID-19 for people who have symptoms, or asymptomatic people who have been exposed to a person who has COVID-19, stating that home tests are "especially important" before gatherings with unvaccinated children, the elderly, or others at risk of serious disease. The CDC states several times on this site that testing is necessary even for vaccinated people, and that people who test positive should isolate and wear a mask if they are in contact with others regardless of their vaccination status.
The CDC site recommends consulting the FDA’s website for a list of at-home tests approved under an Emergency Use Authorization. The tests are available at drug stores like Walgreens and CVS, and also can be obtained free from local health departments. One of the tests listed on the FDA’s site is the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self-Test, made by Abbott Labs.
Major Concerns
There are many reasons to be concerned about this test. A document called "Healthcare Provider Instructions for Use" includes this statement:
"Individuals should report their test result through the NAVICA app (created by Abbott and downloadable for free) and provide all results to their healthcare provider in order to receive appropriate care. All healthcare providers will report all test results they receive from individuals who use the authorized product to relevant public health authorities…"
In other words, if you test positive and notify a physician or other healthcare provider, your local health authorities will likely know about your positive test results too. Health departments might be collecting test results just because collecting data is one of the things they are supposed to do. They might be collecting this data in order to continue to generate fear by reporting cases to the media every day. Or they might be planning something else, such as monitoring people who test positive in order to make sure that they quarantine at home; or even removing people from their homes and taking them to a quarantine camp. This is already happening in other countries, and after having our rights and freedoms taken away for almost two years now, it’s no longer possible to trust government and health officials. Anything is possible.
But that’s not all. The instructions document also includes this statement about the reagent solution used in the test:
"The Reagent Solution contains a harmful chemical…If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice."
The chemical is sodium azide, and here are excerpts from a CDC website providing facts about sodium azide:
"Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid."
Sodium azide is best known as the chemical found in automobile airbags. An electrical charge triggered by automobile impact causes sodium azide to explode and convert to nitrogen gas inside the airbag.
Sodium azide is used as a chemical preservative in hospitals and laboratories. Accidents have occurred in these settings. In one case, sodium azide was poured into a drain, where it exploded and the toxic gas was inhaled (breathed in)
Sodium azide is used in agriculture (farming) for pest control.
Sodium azide is also used in detonators and other explosives
Following release of sodium azide into the air, you could be exposed by breathing in the dust or the gas that is formed.
Sodium azide can also enter the body and cause symptoms through skin contact.
An explosion involving sodium azide may cause burn injury as well as expose people to the toxic gas, hydrozoic acid.
Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die.
Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen."
There’s more, but I think you get the idea. Exposure to even a small amount of this substance may be harmful.
The first time I reviewed the instructions document, the directions for use were extremely confusing. Consumers must have complained, because within a few days eleven pages of instructions with pictures were added. I still found the directions very confusing.
Efficacy
If you can figure out how to test yourself without being harmed by the reagent, what can you expect?
Consumers are instructed that if their test is negative, they should wait 24 hours and take another test. Apparently you keep looking for COVID until you find it!
"…a negative test does not rule out COVID-19 and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions, including infection control decisions… Negative results should be treated as presumptive and confirmed with a molecular assay, if necessary, for patient management."
"Positive test results do not differentiate between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2."
(In other words, you may test positive and NOT have SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19)
"Testing for asymptomatic individuals should be performed at least twice over three days, with at least twenty-four hours and no more than 48 hours between tests. You may need to purchase additional tests to perform this serial (repeat) testing." Again, we look and look and look for COVID until we find it!!
There are several caveats about interpretation of results if the consumer is unable to follow the directions exactly, which, as I mentioned before, are complicated:
"False negative results may occur if a specimen is improperly collected or handled."
"False negative results may occur if inadequate extraction buffer is used (e.g., < 6 drops)."
"False negative results may occur if specimen swabs are not twirled within the test card."
"False negative results may occur if swabs are stored in their paper sheath after specimen collection.
Information Submitted to the FDA
After reading this section, one might wonder why the FDA even bothered to pretend to review any data:
"The performance of this test has not yet been clinically validated for use in patients without signs and symptoms of respiratory infection or for serial screening applications, and performance may differ in these populations." The problem is that these are specific applications for which the test is being used – asymptomatic people and serial testing.
The PCR test was used as the comparator method. I have written extensively about limitations of the PCR test, which include a very high risk of false positives. For example, in 2006, massive PCR testing was performed at the Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center when it was thought that the medical center was experiencing an epidemic of whooping cough. Almost 1000 healthcare workers were furloughed until their test results were returned. Over 140 employees were told that they had whooping cough, and thousands of others who tested positive were given antibiotics and/or a vaccine for whooping cough.
Almost eight months later, employees received an email from the hospital administration which stated that the entire episode was due to PCR testing error. Not even one case of whooping cough was confirmed with a more reliable follow-up test, and it was determined that the employees just had a common cold, not whooping cough.
In other words, the error rate was 100%.
Mr. Fauci admitted such limitations of the PCR test in a podcast in July 2020.
"The performance of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test was established with 53 nasal swabs collected from individual symptomatic patients (within 7 days of onset) who were suspected of COVID-19."
There is more "evidence" for the validity of the test in the document, but none of it justifies approving the use of this test in any situation, let alone for mass distribution.
The Bottom Line
There are significant risks associated with taking this test:
If you report your meaningless results, your status might be used by the government to regulate your activity or confine you; or perhaps even to force vaccinate you or make your return to regular life contingent on a booster shot.
Your meaningless test results may also be used by your local health department to determine the rules and restrictions in your area.
A negative test is meaningless, and you may be mandated to repeat the test or subject yourself to other tests in a medical setting. The intent seems to be to record as many "cases" as possible.
A positive test also is meaningless since the test cannot distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.
People falsely thought that ending the use of PCR testing would put a stop to some of the COVID nonsense, including the false positives that allow the government to justify its tyrannical actions. Not true. It appears that the new tests are as bad or worse.