Testing 1-2-3
Want to support freedom of press and free speech? Become a premium subscriber today and support independent journalism.
AFLDS recently filed a brief with the Supreme Court noting that these injections are merely a personal treatment choice, and not a public health measure at all. With over 50 other citations, AFLDS’ brief breaks new legal ground.
SCOTUS has scheduled one hour of oral argument on the OSHA mandate TODAY, Friday, January 7, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. EST. A second hour of oral argument on the CMS mandate for healthcare workers will be conducted at 11:00 a.m. EST.
The arguments can be viewed LIVE here:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?516919-1/justices-hear-case-vaccine-mandate-health-care-workers
Is January 7th a moment of truth for the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments for stay of two vaccine mandates
The Ignorant
There are many reasons for the Supreme Court to order a stay for the vaccine mandates:
legal. There is no legality for the vaccine mandate: a) separation of powers, Congress did not explicitly delegate this power to the executive and b) what is the legality of mandating experimental vaccines, considering the vaccines don't work?
health. The health benefits of the covid-19 experimental vaccines are minimal if not negative.
liberties & rights. Is the body autonomy a right? Is the choice to live or die a right? Is a medical treatment choice a right? These all are human rights, of course, and they must be respected.
personal. Trust in government, society and other professionals like medical eroded to a point where it is a class warfare.
Sex, Boundaries, and Vaccine Mandates
The connection between sexual abuse and medical rape
Stephanie Brail
…Let me just say that I think modern America has an incredibly unhealthy relationship with sex, not due to suppression of the sex drive but via obsession with it. Sex is everywhere, it sells our food and everything else under the sun. You can’t turn on the TV these days without excessive sex, some of it extremely graphic, being thrown in your faces.
This pornographization of our culture has degraded it and made it shallow and selfish.
Excessive focus on sex causes all sorts of seemingly unrelated problems, from the pressures teenage girls face to look pretty to older women desperate pursuing plastic surgery to maintain their “sexiness” rather than finding value in their age and wisdom.
Sex and Boundaries
…We all have natural boundaries, physical and psychic, that serve to protect us both energetically and physically.
Breaking down natural modesty and replacing it with a “show it all off” sex-in-your-face culture is not healthy.
There’s a middle ground between the total repression of a full-body burka and running around with your tits and ass hanging out. (I remember being at a club in Los Angeles, actually, it was literally the Roxbury from that stupid movie of years ago...and there were two girls wearing sequined mini-dresses and clearly no underwear hanging out by the door. Gross.)
I used to have a stripper for a roommate. I saw up close and personal what this profession did to her spirit. It was far from empowering, which is the lie that gets told to young women – just flaunt your sexuality, it’s empowering. Bullshit.
She was desperate for money and would convince herself she was genuinely into the guys she was gold-digging.
She decided in her mid-30s that she’d go even further and try to become a prostitute on the Bunny Ranch TV show. I tried to talk her out of it, tried to get her ex-boyfriend to stop her. She was furious with me and I haven’t spoken to her since.
Her personal boundaries were so messed up from years of giving her body away to men for money. There’s a lot more I could say about it, but just trust me on this.
Now I can bet right now I have some readers who are going to argue with me and say I am being judgmental or that I’m wrong.
I’m not a prude. I was quite promiscuous when I was younger and gave myself a new age excuse that I was just being loving to new guys I met.
They were just using me for my body and many were total assholes.
I’ve had to do a lot of energetic clearing to get rid of the toxic spiritual gunk that I picked up on those “adventures” in my youth.
Sufficed to say, personal boundaries are an important thing for a variety of reasons. And when you give your body away, you are also giving you soul away on some level.
Vaccine Mandates and Boundaries
Here’s the connection with the vaccine mandates:
When you give your body away on a regular basis, you start to lose your sense of self.
This is when it becomes much easier for some outside force to control and manipulate you.
So, even if you were giving yourself away by your own choice at first...you actually make yourself more prone to being manipulated and coerced down the line.
Why? You lost of some of your natural psychic shield by not protecting your own boundaries more.
Furthermore, if you are forced to get medical procedures against your will, such as a vaccine, it’s a type of rape.
Repeated medical rape will have consequences physically, emotionally, and spiritually.
A partial consent to the medical rape is not really consent if outside pressure is enabling it.
…Regardless, people who cave into vaccine mandates are now priming themselves to be more vulnerable to increased invasion of their personal boundaries, which could show up in the form of more draconian medical mandates or other forms of external control.
Ultimately, our ability to maintain a personal space is an important part of our emotional and spiritual health.
It’s not just about our physical bodies but our spirits.
…a medical mandate is basically a form of rape.
Rape is traumatizing, degrades the spirit, disconnects us from God, and makes us more open to negative external forces.
Why and How Mass COVID-19 Testing is Deadly
False Positives Cause Families to Underestimate Risk of Severe COVID-19, Cause People to Believe They Are Immune, and Fuel Re-infection Myths
James Lyons-Weiler
…Indiscriminate testing with sequence-based confirmation is reckless and irresponsible. Requiring a negative test for work or school is unthinkable: the numbers have muddied the counting, altered perception on risk of COVID-19, and leads to the false impression of safety due to natural immunity.
Unless a person has been in contact with someone who has a bona fide, confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (confirmed by Sanger sequencing), and/or are symptomatic, there is no reason to test. In fact, there is every reason to NOT test.
If a person is tested via PCR, they won’t be told the cycle number - nor the cycle threshold used to call the test result. The values are kept secret by the CDC, public health departments, medical physicians and testing companies - under the bullshit explanation of “proprietary information”.
Related Articles and Videos
Basile et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33087255/
Marine Recruit Study https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2029717
CDC’s Deadly Testing Fiasco Article
Follow the Science article
My interview with Dr. Ted Kreitzman
He's an anesthesiologist who has already had COVID and refuses to get vaccinated. Now he's not allowed to work anywhere even though he's a lower risk than any vaccinated doctor.
Steve Kirsch
My most recent interview is with Dr. Ted Kreitzman who is an anesthesiologist in Arizona for 29 years.
He’s already had COVID so he’s no risk to anyone.
But he’s locked out of working anywhere based on hospital policy at all hospitals (recovered immunity is not acceptable) and his colleagues won’t stand up for him since that could endanger their careers.
When he tries to use science to convince other doctors, they won’t listen. They just walk away and refuse to engage.
Booster efficacy (or lack thereof) visualization
This video has a nice visualization of how well the booster works over time. This is based on UK government data. No surprises here: the booster is mostly helping the virus.
Steve Kirsch
One thing that the vaccine mandates seem to accomplish is to make it easier for the virus to infect you and to prolong the pandemic. This of course is exactly the opposite of what we are being told.
This video provides a nice visualization of the effect of the booster shots over time.
I’m not sure who made the video, but the graphs are consistent with data I’ve seen elsewhere.
More Harm Than Good
Pfizer Inoculations via the Canadian COVID Care Alliance.org.
Universities' Covid Policies Defy Science and Reason
Parents and students should challenge dogma with data.
Marty Makary M.D., M.P.H.
Universities are supposed to be bastions of critical thinking, reason and logic. But the Covid policies they have adopted—policies that have derailed two years of students’ education and threaten to upend the upcoming spring semester—have exposed them as nonsensical, anti-scientific and often downright cruel.
Some of America’s most prestigious universities are leading the charge.
At Georgetown University, fully vaccinated students are randomly tested for Covid every week. Using a PCR test, which can detect tiny amounts of dead virus, asymptomatic students who test positive are ordered to a room in a designated building where they spend 10 days in confinement. Food is dropped off once a day at the door.
I spoke to several students who were holed up. One of them told me she would sometimes call a friend to come and wave at her through the window, just to see a human face. Another told me that the experience in quarantine “totally changed” her feelings about the school. “Everyone’s just fed up at this point,” she said. “People walk around the library and yell at you if you drink a sip of water. And it was during finals.” She told me she is thinking about “transferring to an SEC school just to have an in-person experience.”
Given the fact that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recently changed the official quarantine period from from 10 days to five, I reached out to Georgetown’s Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. Ranit Mishori. She told me that Georgetown is still using a 10-day quarantine.
Students are the lowest risk population on planet Earth. Over the last six months, the risk of a person in the broader age group (15-24) dying of Covid or dying with Covid (the CDC does not clearly distinguish), was 0.001%. All or nearly all of those deaths were in a very specific subgroup: unvaccinated people with a medical comorbidity. But despite Georgetown’s strict vaccination, masking, testing, and quarantine requirements, the university announced late last month that “all University events, including meetings with visitors, will need to be held virtually or outdoors,” among many other restrictions.
At Princeton University, fully vaccinated students are not allowed to leave the county unless they are on a sports team. They’re also testing all students twice a week, usurping the scarce testing supply from vulnerable communities so that low-risk, young people can use them.
At Cornell, masks are still the rule—and even recommended outdoors.
…At Amherst, students must double mask if they don’t use a KN95. In nearby Boston, at Emerson College, students are tested twice a week and have stay-in-room orders. The college instructs students to “only leave their residence halls or place of residence for testing, meals, medical appointments, necessary employment, or to get mail.” Seriously.
At these institutions of higher learning and thousands more, science is supposedly held in the highest esteem. So where is the scientific support for masking outdoors? Where is the scientific support for constantly testing fully vaccinated young people? Where is the support for the confinement of asymptomatic, young people who test positive for a virus to which they are already immune on a campus of other immune people?
The data simply do not justify any of it.
Sadly, these people who have gotten 3-4 doses, do not get why they keep getting COVID or cannot get rid of their symptoms. Instead of learning about EARLY TREATMENT OPTIONS, HOW TO PREVENT AND PROTECT THEMSELVES, THEY CONTINUE TO BE SICK AND TELL OTHERS TO TAKE THEIR TEMPERATURE (AS IF THAT IS GOING TO CURE THEM). How about stop listening to the media, Big Pharma and politicians (and Fauci) and start listening to the 16,000+ doctors and scientists who are saving people lives. Oh no…
She says:
I have been recovering from a break-through case of Covid for the last two weeks.
I keep getting this random fever that makes me miserable every day, but then breaks like clockwork. As someone who is now on her third round of COVID, I have become obsessed with differentiating between each version I have had, as if it will give me some insight into why any of this is happening at all.
Testing testing 1-2-3
Jon Rappoport
On December 29, the head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, announced, in a White House press briefing, that the PCR test can register positive (meaning the person is “infected”) long AFTER infection is over.
Here’s Walensky’s money quote:
“…people can remain PCR positive for up to 12 weeks after infection and long after they are transmissible and infectious.”
That means MILLIONS of FALSE positive test results have been logged as REAL, in the past two years.
If you can’t trace the implications of THAT, I can’t help you.
Recall the old Zen Koan: What is the sound of one hand clapping?
The new version is: What is the sound of the White House press corps after Walensky’s admission?
And is the answer is: Nothing. Zero. Silence. And not stunned silence. No. Clueless silence. Sold-out silence.
No shouting. No furor. No questions.
“Dear Mr. Smith, We here at the CDC wish to inform to you that your positive PCR COVID test, administered in the spring of 2020, was misleading. There was no proof it meant you were infected. Therefore, your isolation, your hospitalization, during which your business closed and went into bankruptcy, your wife left home taking up residence with the children at her mother’s, your business partner committed suicide—all that was unnecessary. Thank you for your understanding.”
Of course, the blind following the blind following Fauci will say, “But…but…the CDC couldn’t have made a mistake that big…there must be some explanation…”
And yes, there is an explanation. The CDC and other public health officials have known all along they were running a scam. Committing a crime. A Nuremberg-type crime.