The truth is this unapproved, experimental C0V!D “shot” has injured people all around us. People we love dearly.
And we’re being pressured into staying silent.
But we want you to discover the truth in this 31-page ebook report: The REAL number of C0V!D vax injuries and deaths.
This amazing ebook features cutting-edge content from some of the world’s most sought after doctors, such as Dr. Peter McCullough, who is the most published cardiorenal doctor in history, and has published over 46 papers on this pandemic.
He is the cardiologist at Baylor University Medical Center, the chief editor for several prestigious medical journals, and he has over 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine...
Which makes Dr. McCullough one of the most qualified doctors in the world to speak on this subject.
In this free ebook you’ll discover:
The shocking truth about the “partial” number of deaths being reported in VAERS, the “official” — but voluntary — government reporting system.
How social isolation, fearmongering, and the media-enforced culture played into people accepting an unsafe “injection”.
Why the Delta variant is proving the shot to be completely ineffective.
How the vax is prompting new variants around the world, including the Epsilon variant out of California.
The Journal of Public Health Policy and Law reports on the explosive mortality risk within the first week of receiving the injection.
Why in early development of some C0V!D shots the majority of the animals died — there were several instances.
The injection’s connection with cancer, autoimmune disease, and brain disease.
And so much more.
Discover The REAL number of C-19 vax injuries and deaths by tapping here now (FR-EE Download).
Dr Zach Bush:
The 1st Amendment of our Constitution states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
These rights are being taken away.
We are complacent.
We have forgotten what freedom tastes and looks like.
We have forgotten why freedom is important.
Freedom is not convenient to practice, or easy to win...
But it can be taken away in an instant.
After you read this post, try spending some time away from your phone, computer, and television. Tune out the media for just a few moments, relax into silence, breathe deeply, and create healthy boundaries. Remind yourself that you are the vessel of light that came into being right now.
You are alive, you are on purpose, and you create your own reality. If that reality is full of fear, find a new source of perspective and rediscover your intuition.
If you find your freedoms disappearing, exercise your freedom of speech. Hold your media and your government accountable. Stop voting red and blue. Start building a community of curious and adventurous people that are willing to push the envelope of the common narrative.
Be willing to be uncomfortable in the pursuit of freedom.
Go run down a forest path, go run up that mountain peak. Nature will show you what nature looks like. She will show you what rebirth looks like. She will show you there is no death, there is no waste, there are no mistakes in the fabric of our reality.
We can let go of the fear. We can breathe deeper, and we can run farther…
We are at a crossroad
We can choose to use all available tools to eradicate this virus, or we can allow it to become a permanent fellow traveler, endemic to humanity. The first option has a high cost, but that cost is finite, largely ending when the disease ends. The second option is much worse. To the cost that we have already paid, add a continuing pattern of suffering and casualties going forward indefinitely. This toll is incalculable. Some have argued that it is already too late—an evolutionary hazard we warned about early in the pandemic—but we have yet to see a compelling argument to support this belief, and until such a case is made we, together, are morally obligated to pursue the eradication of Covid-19.
If we are interested in minimizing harm from SARS-CoV2, we need to use prophylaxis to force extinction. Prophylaxis refers to action taken before exposure to prevent an event. A condom is prophylaxis against pregnancy. Doxycycline is prophylaxis against malaria. Vaccines and repurposed drugs such as ivermectin have both been presented as prophylaxis against Covid-19. In order to clear our planet of SARS-CoV2, we need safe and effective prophylaxis distributed so widely that it drives the virus to extinction.
…the current vaccines—which are non-sterilizing, cannot quickly reach the entire world, and provide only narrow, short-lived immunity—cannot accomplish the goal, not even in principle. Any viable strategy for extinguishing SARS-CoV-2 in the near term must therefore include effective prophylaxis beyond the current crop of authorized vaccines. For now that means drugs taken to prevent infection for those who are unvaccinated and who have not had a confirmed case of Covid (and therefore lack natural immunity). It may also require prophylactic medicine for vaccinated people as fading vaccine-induced immunity and new variants evolving in response to the vaccination campaign render the current vaccines ever less effective.
This is a departure for us, running exactly counter to our typical expectations. Ordinarily, we are enthusiastic about vaccines and decidedly skeptical about pills. On this issue though, with these vaccines, our position has flipped. There are several reasons for this: the novel and non-sterilizing nature of the vaccines being deployed, the potential for perverse incentives involved in a vaccine only strategy, emerging concerns about vaccine safety, and the logistical reality that vaccines alone cannot, and will not, get the job done. In addition, the most promising prophylactic medicine is also extremely well known, with a four-decade long and unusually clean global safety record. This reasoning is discussed in episode #87 of our podcast.
Our simple position is this: we advocate using every sufficiently safe tool at our disposal to drive Covid-19 to extinction, whether it is profitable or not. The alternative to success is unthinkable, and we cannot fathom a reason not to wield all useful weapons in this fight. The clear failure of informed consent, and a pharmaceutical safety system riddled with perverse incentives, is our chief complaint.
Regardless of where you land on issues of vaccines and prophylactics, we should all be unified in the goal of eradication, and to that end the public deserves to be party to open, transparent, and honest scientific discourse regarding this virus and our way through it. In pursuit of that goal we have worked diligently throughout the pandemic to communicate what we know, what we think we know, and where we think the public is being misled. We have also been careful to correct our own errors when we have made them.
We’ve Never Seen Vaccine Injuries on This Scale
Now, in less than a year, more than half a million reports of injuries have flooded into VAERS following experimental COVID jabs, including thousands of deaths. Yet a deafening regulatory silence has greeted this record-setting volume of adverse reactions, which accounts for nearly a third of all reports accumulated by VAERS over its entire three-decade lifespan.
How is the absence of “early warning system” alarm bells possible? In a recent commentary, “Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals,” an experienced statistician suggested not only have safety experts’ admonitions to get COVID vaccine safety monitoring “right” not been heeded, but CDC and other public health agencies have taken steps to intentionally hide safety signals.
It’s all in the algorithm
Statistician Mathew Crawford’s various articles have a humble aim: to “lay out the tools for how to think about difficult problems” that he suspects “many people are highly confused about.”
In the matter of COVID vaccine safety signals, Crawford performs a valuable service by competently scrutinizing the VAERS “Standard Operating Procedures for COVID-19,” which, he notes, CDC published “without much fanfare” on Jan. 29.
Specifically, Crawford dissects a key data-mining tool outlined by CDC in the Jan. 29 document. The tool, called a “proportional reporting ratio” (PRR), assesses one vaccine against another — comparing “the proportion of a specific AE [adverse event] following a specific vaccine versus the proportion of the same AE following receipt of another vaccine.”
So far, so good — except rather than doing the job it is professed to do, the PRR instead appears to be shockingly impervious to safety signals.
Even for those with no statistical background, Crawford’s bottom-line conclusion could not be plainer:
“[O]ne vaccine that kills and cripples 20 or 50 or 1,000 times as much as a very safe vaccine will show the same PRR … and no safety signal will be identified by the CDC. By design … [E]ven if I take a cell … and plug in some enormous number like 1500, there is still no safety signal as per CDC definitions.” [Emphasis in original]
As Crawford points out, these undeniable mathematical patterns cannot help but raise suspicions that the PRR function is designed to “establish an illusion of safety” and provide “a reason to ignore the true signs of danger.”
Initially, Crawford was willing to entertain the possibility that incompetence, rather than malevolence, might explain his findings — but he quickly rejected this explanation, in large part because the mathematical defect is so brazenly obvious that even a “middling programmer without the fundamental mathematical training” would notice it.
In Crawford’s words, “There is a pride among geeks in identifying subtle mathematical or logical flaws in a system, and this is not subtle at all.”
According to Crawford, this leads to some stark implications:
“At some point, when the potential for conflicts of interest are high and the point of failure is fundamental to the task of those doing the job, incompetence should no longer be differentiated from criminal intent.”
The imploding safety narrative
Statistical tricks (and conflicts of interest) are not new to the vaccine or pharmaceutical industries, which have used them for decades to successfully mask the “chasm between vaccine rhetoric and reality.”
Even when drug warning systems seem to “work,” the lag time between reports of harm and regulatory action is, on average, 20 years.
In that light — with FDA speeding toward full approval of the Pfizer injection, Moderna gaining fast-track designation to test other experimental mRNA vaccines in children and adults and CDC benignly maintaining that the results of COVID vaccine safety monitoring are “reassuring” — it is not hard to be discouraged about the agencies’ continued ability to get away with misusing and abusing safety data from VAERS and other sources.
However, the safety narrative started imploding in a big way in late 2019, when the world’s top vaccine experts gathered at the World Health Organization and admitted, almost to a person, that vaccines are sometimes fatal and that safety monitoring is failing to capture the dangers.
COVID may have provided these worried experts with a temporary and convenient reprieve, but more and more people recognize that the premise that vaccine adverse events are “one in a million” is an utter fiction.
With injuries from COVID vaccines occurring on an unprecedented scale — and credible doctors and scientists issuing urgent warnings about short-term and longer-term damage — it may become increasingly difficult for the vaccine establishment to shove its problems under the statistical carpet.
In 1976, public health authorities were forced to halt their rollout of a rapidly mobilized swine flu vaccine, after a spate of negative publicity and some 4,000 serious adverse events — including Guillain-Barré syndrome and death — became impossible to ignore. This “medical debacle,” now widely acknowledged as such, became the focus of a 1979 episode of 60 Minutes.
With more than half a million COVID vaccine injuries now reported to VAERS alone, and many more reported around the world, current events dwarf the 1976 “debacle.”
Without corporate media support, many individuals and organizations are therefore holding unethical government officials’ and profiteering corporate executives’ feet to the fire.
They recognize, as the nonprofit Stand for Health Freedom recently noted, that the matter of data is not inconsequential: “The COVID pandemic is built on data,” and data are driving policies that are “changing the structure of our society.”
I also recommend this free ebook about the treatments and protocols that have been suppressed and censored.
“7 Superior Covid Treatments that are Being Suppressed - And the Clinical Data that Proves It!”
In this brand new ebook, you’ll also learn how people are healing from C-19 vax injury, through these treatments methods, and show their breakthrough recoveries.
You’ll find numerous treatment protocols that have been PROVEN to work by top doctors like Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and internist from Dallas, Texas who has 46 publications covering this topic — and who testified at the Department of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee about his findings.
They were SHOCKED at what he revealed because the corporate media has been censoring it.
“We basically broke the news to America that we could treat the virus AND markedly reduce hospitalization and death.”
And Dr. McCullough is just one of many experts that Jonathan Otto interviewed for this ebook.
Here’s what else you’ll find inside:
Which specific combination of drugs actually works to combat C0V!D-19?
Does taking Vitamin D help at all? You may be surprised.
What world-renowned expert Dr. Peter McCullough found works best with his patients
Does Hydroxychloroquine work? See the numbers for yourself.
Which medication has favorable results for both inpatient and outpatient use, including almost 70% reduction in mortality for C0V!D 19?
THIS treatment showed an 87% reduction in hospitalizations in a randomized trial called the Stoic Trial.
Which protocols are getting an 85% reduction in hospitalization rates and death, according to the Cleveland Clinic calculator?
Does your diet impact your battle with this virus? And how does it interact with the vaccine?
Are medical journals colluding with Big Pharma to hide vital information from you?
Plus so much more
Once you download this complimentary ebook, you’ll receive fr-ee access to Jonathan's brand new 10 episode docuseries, Vaccine Secrets: C0V!D Crisis.
How to Protect Your Health After the Jab
This is an excellent article, interview with Dr Zelenko who has been saving people’s lives with his treatment/protocols and he tells it like it is.
NAC has been taken off Amazon, I wrote about this a month or two ago.
Here is one resource I found that seems good from IHerb but do not see where/how to order it, no phone number to call them